* [PATCHv2] dmaengine: st_fdma: simplify allocation
@ 2026-06-08 5:18 Rosen Penev
2026-06-08 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-06-08 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmaengine
Cc: Patrice Chotard, Vinod Koul, Frank Li, Kees Cook,
Gustavo A. R. Silva, moderated list:ARM/STI ARCHITECTURE,
open list,
open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be|_ptr)?b
Use a flexible array member to combine kzalloc and kcalloc to a single
allocation.
Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. Assign counting variable
after allocation before any array accesses.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
v2: update description.
drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
drivers/dma/st_fdma.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
index d9547017f3bd..3ec0d6731b8d 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
@@ -710,16 +710,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id st_fdma_match[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_fdma_match);
-static int st_fdma_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
- const struct st_fdma_driverdata *drvdata,
- struct st_fdma_dev *fdev)
-{
- snprintf(fdev->fw_name, FW_NAME_SIZE, "fdma_%s_%d.elf",
- drvdata->name, drvdata->id);
-
- return of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "dma-channels",
- &fdev->nr_channels);
-}
#define FDMA_DMA_BUSWIDTHS (BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) | \
BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES) | \
BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_3_BYTES) | \
@@ -742,27 +732,26 @@ static int st_fdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct st_fdma_dev *fdev;
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
const struct st_fdma_driverdata *drvdata;
+ u32 nr_channels;
int ret, i;
drvdata = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
- fdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*fdev), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!fdev)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = st_fdma_parse_dt(pdev, drvdata, fdev);
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "dma-channels", &nr_channels);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to find platform data\n");
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}
- fdev->chans = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, fdev->nr_channels,
- sizeof(struct st_fdma_chan), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!fdev->chans)
+ fdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(fdev, chans, nr_channels), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fdev)
return -ENOMEM;
+ fdev->nr_channels = nr_channels;
fdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
fdev->drvdata = drvdata;
+ snprintf(fdev->fw_name, FW_NAME_SIZE, "fdma_%s_%d.elf", drvdata->name, drvdata->id);
+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fdev);
fdev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
index f1e746f7bc7d..27ded555879f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
@@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ struct st_fdma_dev {
int irq;
- struct st_fdma_chan *chans;
-
spinlock_t dreq_lock;
unsigned long dreq_mask;
u32 nr_channels;
char fw_name[FW_NAME_SIZE];
+
+ struct st_fdma_chan chans[] __counted_by(nr_channels);
};
/* Peripheral Registers*/
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: st_fdma: simplify allocation
2026-06-08 5:18 [PATCHv2] dmaengine: st_fdma: simplify allocation Rosen Penev
@ 2026-06-08 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-08 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rosen Penev; +Cc: dmaengine, Frank.Li, vkoul
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The IRQ handler iterates over the interrupt status register without verifying bounds against `nr_channels`, allowing hardware to trigger out-of-bounds memory accesses.
- [High] The driver requests the IRQ before initializing the virtual DMA channels, leading to a potential crash due to uninitialized spinlock access if a pending interrupt fires immediately.
- [High] The `st_fdma_remove()` function fails to kill the `vchan` tasklets, leading to a potential use-after-free when the `fdev` structure is freed by devres.
- [High] Squashing the negative error code from `platform_get_irq()` to `-EINVAL` breaks deferred probing.
- [High] On the probe error path, `st_fdma_free()` removes channels from the `dma_device.channels` list before the devres unwinder calls `dma_async_device_unregister()`, leaking sysfs devices and percpu memory.
--
commit ce37cbca5ef5b425ece0170e4264843d1f67946c
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dmaengine: st_fdma: simplify allocation
Use a flexible array member to combine kzalloc and kcalloc to a single
allocation. Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. Assign counting
variable after allocation before any array accesses.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> index d9547017f3bd6..3ec0d6731b8dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -742,27 +732,26 @@ static int st_fdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct st_fdma_dev *fdev;
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> const struct st_fdma_driverdata *drvdata;
> + u32 nr_channels;
> int ret, i;
>
> drvdata = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> - fdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*fdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!fdev)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - ret = st_fdma_parse_dt(pdev, drvdata, fdev);
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "dma-channels", &nr_channels);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to find platform data\n");
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - fdev->chans = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, fdev->nr_channels,
> - sizeof(struct st_fdma_chan), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!fdev->chans)
> + fdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(fdev, chans, nr_channels), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!fdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + fdev->nr_channels = nr_channels;
> fdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> fdev->drvdata = drvdata;
> + snprintf(fdev->fw_name, FW_NAME_SIZE, "fdma_%s_%d.elf", drvdata->name, drvdata->id);
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fdev);
>
> fdev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but squashing the negative error
code from platform_get_irq() to -EINVAL breaks deferred probing.
platform_get_irq() can return -EPROBE_DEFER if the interrupt controller is
not yet ready. By overwriting the error code, the driver prevents the
subsystem from retrying the probe later:
fdev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (fdev->irq < 0)
return -EINVAL;
Does this code leave the device non-functional on systems dependent on
specific probe ordering?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the driver request the IRQ before
initializing the virtual DMA channels?
In st_fdma_probe(), devm_request_irq() is called before the loop that
invokes vchan_init():
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, fdev->irq, st_fdma_irq_handler, 0,
dev_name(&pdev->dev), fdev);
...
for (i = 0; i < fdev->nr_channels; i++) {
...
vchan_init(&fchan->vchan, &fdev->dma_device);
}
If an interrupt is already pending from a previous system state, could
st_fdma_irq_handler() run immediately and attempt to acquire
fchan->vchan.lock before vchan_init() has initialized it, leading to an
uninitialized spinlock access?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the IRQ handler iterate
over the interrupt status register without verifying bounds against
nr_channels?
drivers/dma/st_fdma.c:st_fdma_irq_handler() {
...
for (; int_sta != 0 ; int_sta >>= 2, fchan++) {
...
If the hardware sets interrupt status bits for channels equal to or greater
than the configured nr_channels, could this increment the fchan pointer
past the end of the fdev->chans flexible array and cause out-of-bounds
memory accesses?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does st_fdma_remove() fail to explicitly
kill the vchan tasklets?
drivers/dma/st_fdma.c:st_fdma_remove() {
struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fdev->irq, fdev);
...
The device removal callback does not call tasklet_kill() for the channels.
When st_fdma_remove() returns, devres automatically frees the fdev
structure. If a tasklet was scheduled right before the IRQ was freed and
runs after the struct is freed, could it access the vchan struct embedded
in fdev and cause a use-after-free?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does st_fdma_free() remove
channels from the dma_device.channels list before the devres unwinder calls
dma_async_device_unregister()?
During the probe error path, st_fdma_free() is called manually:
err_rproc:
st_fdma_free(fdev);
This function executes list_del(&fchan->vchan.chan.device_node), removing
channels from the device list:
drivers/dma/st_fdma.c:st_fdma_free() {
...
list_del(&fchan->vchan.chan.device_node);
...
When the devres unwinder subsequently calls dma_async_device_unregister(),
does it iterate over an empty list and skip the channel unregistration,
leaking the allocated percpu memory and sysfs nodes?
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
> index f1e746f7bc7dc..27ded555879fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ struct st_fdma_dev {
>
> int irq;
>
> - struct st_fdma_chan *chans;
> -
> spinlock_t dreq_lock;
> unsigned long dreq_mask;
>
> u32 nr_channels;
> char fw_name[FW_NAME_SIZE];
> +
> + struct st_fdma_chan chans[] __counted_by(nr_channels);
> };
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608051829.7390-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-08 5:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-08 5:18 [PATCHv2] dmaengine: st_fdma: simplify allocation Rosen Penev
2026-06-08 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox