* [PATCH v4] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
@ 2026-06-08 11:20 Devendra K Verma
2026-06-08 11:44 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Devendra K Verma @ 2026-06-08 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bhelgaas, mani, vkoul, Frank.Li
Cc: dmaengine, linux-kernel, michal.simek, devendra.verma
As per 'Designware Cores PCI Express Controller Databook',
Section 7.1 - Overview, HDMA supports 64 Read and 64 Write
channels. Current controller driver supports up to 8 read and
write channels only. In order to utilize all the channels the
controller driver need to have the channel related structs
and variables as per the number of channels supported by IP.
Following changes are made to enable 64 Read / 64 Write
channel support:
o Defined HDMA specific macros to reflect the channel count.
o The count of ll_regions and dt_regions in dw_edma_chip and
dw_edma_pcie_data shall be in accordance to number of read
and write channels.
o In dw_edma_probe() configure the channels as per the channels
of the IP used.
o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
---
Changes in v3:
o Reverted the FIX for AI reported GET_CH_32() issue, as
per the recommendation of reviewers, need to create
separate patch for it.
Changes in v2:
o Fixed the pre-existing bug related to GET_CH_32
interchanging the channel direction and id.
This bug was not caused by any version of this patch.
o Fixed the issue when using for_each_set_bit() for mask
of u64 type.
Changes in v1:
o On review recommendation of sashiko bot, in the function
dw_hdma_v0_core_off(), the loop iterates over registers
as per the number of channels enabled and not on total
number of channels supported.
o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
---
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 19 ++++++++++-----
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 4 ++--
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 8 +++----
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h | 2 +-
include/linux/dma/edma.h | 10 ++++----
6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
index c2feb3adc79f..adf1b3939f96 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
@@ -925,9 +925,9 @@ static int dw_edma_channel_setup(struct dw_edma *dw, u32 wr_alloc, u32 rd_alloc)
irq = &dw->irq[pos];
if (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
- irq->wr_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
+ irq->wr_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
else
- irq->rd_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
+ irq->rd_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
irq->dw = dw;
memcpy(&chan->msi, &irq->msi, sizeof(chan->msi));
@@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
struct dw_edma *dw;
u32 wr_alloc = 0;
u32 rd_alloc = 0;
+ u16 max_wr_cnt;
+ u16 max_rd_cnt;
int i, err;
if (!chip)
@@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
dw->chip = chip;
- if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
+ if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
- else
+ max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
+ max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
+ } else {
dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
+ max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
+ max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
+ }
raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
- dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
+ dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
- dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
+ dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
index 902574b1ba86..d12fefbf3952 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ struct dw_edma_chan {
struct dw_edma_irq {
struct msi_msg msi;
- u32 wr_mask;
- u32 rd_mask;
+ u64 wr_mask;
+ u64 rd_mask;
struct dw_edma *dw;
};
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
index 0b30ce138503..79f653da8e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data {
/* eDMA registers location */
struct dw_edma_block rg;
/* eDMA memory linked list location */
- struct dw_edma_block ll_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_block ll_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block ll_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block ll_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* eDMA memory data location */
- struct dw_edma_block dt_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_block dt_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block dt_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block dt_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* Other */
enum dw_edma_map_format mf;
u8 irqs;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
index 632abb8b481c..84b0076f78bf 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
@@ -53,13 +53,24 @@ __dw_ch_regs(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir, u16 ch)
static void dw_hdma_v0_core_off(struct dw_edma *dw)
{
int id;
+ enum dw_edma_dir dir;
+
+ dir = EDMA_DIR_WRITE;
+ for (id = 0; id < dw->wr_ch_cnt; id++) {
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_setup,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_clear,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, ch_en, 0);
+ }
- for (id = 0; id < HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH; id++) {
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, int_setup,
- HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, int_clear,
- HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, ch_en, 0);
+ dir = EDMA_DIR_READ;
+ for (id = 0; id < dw->rd_ch_cnt; id++) {
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_setup,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_clear,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, ch_en, 0);
}
}
@@ -118,7 +129,8 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
unsigned long total, pos, val;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
- unsigned long off, mask;
+ unsigned long off;
+ u64 mask;
if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
@@ -130,7 +142,11 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
}
- for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
+ while (mask) {
+ pos = __ffs64(mask);
+ if (pos >= total)
+ break;
+
chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
@@ -147,6 +163,7 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+ mask &= mask - 1;
}
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
index 7759ba9b4850..48e40efceb2e 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
-#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 8
+#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 64
#define HDMA_V0_CH_EN BIT(0)
#define HDMA_V0_LOCAL_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(6)
#define HDMA_V0_REMOTE_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(5)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
index 1fafd5b0e315..da7a5cc93ad4 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
#define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
#define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
+#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
+#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
struct dw_edma;
@@ -89,12 +91,12 @@ struct dw_edma_chip {
u16 ll_wr_cnt;
u16 ll_rd_cnt;
/* link list address */
- struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* data region */
- struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* interrupt emulation */
int db_irq;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-08 11:20 [PATCH v4] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
@ 2026-06-08 11:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 11:52 ` Verma, Devendra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-08 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devendra K Verma; +Cc: dmaengine, vkoul, Frank.Li
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The DesignWare PCIe controller driver (`pcie-designware.c`) was not updated to reflect the new 64-channel limits for HDMA, breaking configurations that declare more than 8 channels.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The function `dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status()` calls `GET_CH_32` with swapped `dir` and `ch` parameters, resulting in incorrect channel status reads.
--
commit 49f2923c673f70626e15a62547f82ae4f0d06439
Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
As per 'Designware Cores PCI Express Controller Databook',
Section 7.1 - Overview, HDMA supports 64 Read and 64 Write
channels. Current controller driver supports up to 8 read and
write channels only. In order to utilize all the channels the
controller driver need to have the channel related structs
and variables as per the number of channels supported by IP.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> index 632abb8b481cf..84b0076f78bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a parameter ordering
bug in dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() in this file that breaks channel status
reads:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c:dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() {
...
tmp = FIELD_GET(HDMA_V0_CH_STATUS_MASK,
GET_CH_32(dw, chan->id, chan->dir, ch_stat));
...
}
The GET_CH_32 macro expects arguments in the order (dw, dir, ch, name).
Because it is called with chan->id as the direction and chan->dir as the
channel ID, does this cause the driver to read the DMA status of the wrong
channel, potentially leading to missing completions or data corruption?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>
> #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
> #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
[Severity: High]
Does this patch miss updating the bounds checking in the PCIe controller
driver to use the new HDMA channel limits?
In drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c:dw_pcie_edma_find_channels(),
there is a hardcoded sanity check against EDMA_MAX_WR_CH:
if (!pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt || pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH ||
!pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt || pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt > EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
return -EINVAL;
And in dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector(), it limits IRQ allocation to the old maximum:
if (nr >= EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
return -EINVAL;
Will this cause any native HDMA PCIe controller declaring more than 8
channels to fail instantiation or IRQ allocation?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608112011.3289409-1-devendra.verma@amd.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-08 11:44 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-06-08 11:52 ` Verma, Devendra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Devendra @ 2026-06-08 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews; +Cc: dmaengine, vkoul, Frank.Li, Devendra K Verma
On 08-Jun-26 17:14, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> New issues:
> - [High] The DesignWare PCIe controller driver (`pcie-designware.c`) was not updated to reflect the new 64-channel limits for HDMA, breaking configurations that declare more than 8 channels.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] The function `dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status()` calls `GET_CH_32` with swapped `dir` and `ch` parameters, resulting in incorrect channel status reads.
> --
>
> commit 49f2923c673f70626e15a62547f82ae4f0d06439
> Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
>
> dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
>
> As per 'Designware Cores PCI Express Controller Databook',
> Section 7.1 - Overview, HDMA supports 64 Read and 64 Write
> channels. Current controller driver supports up to 8 read and
> write channels only. In order to utilize all the channels the
> controller driver need to have the channel related structs
> and variables as per the number of channels supported by IP.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>> index 632abb8b481cf..84b0076f78bf0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a parameter ordering
> bug in dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() in this file that breaks channel status
> reads:
>
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c:dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() {
> ...
> tmp = FIELD_GET(HDMA_V0_CH_STATUS_MASK,
> GET_CH_32(dw, chan->id, chan->dir, ch_stat));
> ...
> }
>
> The GET_CH_32 macro expects arguments in the order (dw, dir, ch, name).
> Because it is called with chan->id as the direction and chan->dir as the
> channel ID, does this cause the driver to read the DMA status of the wrong
> channel, potentially leading to missing completions or data corruption?
>
> [ ... ]
>
Yes, it is an issue with GET_CH_32. This issue will be fixed in a
separate patch series.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>>
>> #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
>> #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
>> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
>> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this patch miss updating the bounds checking in the PCIe controller
> driver to use the new HDMA channel limits?
>
> In drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c:dw_pcie_edma_find_channels(),
> there is a hardcoded sanity check against EDMA_MAX_WR_CH:
>
> if (!pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt || pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH ||
> !pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt || pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt > EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> return -EINVAL;
>
This specific piece of code is meant for non-HDMA devices because of
no change is required here.
> And in dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector(), it limits IRQ allocation to the old maximum:
>
> if (nr >= EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Will this cause any native HDMA PCIe controller declaring more than 8
> channels to fail instantiation or IRQ allocation?
>
A glue driver is required is needed to enable 64 Read & Write channels.
This limit will not affect the functionality of the IPs for which this
function is implemented. Moreover, this issue can be taken up in a
separate patch series if channels number need to be enhanced.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-08 11:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-08 11:20 [PATCH v4] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
2026-06-08 11:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 11:52 ` Verma, Devendra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox