From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pan Chuang" <panchuang@vivo.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/26] dmaengine: owl-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:16:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709141608.21C001F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709135846.97972-9-panchuang@vivo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver directly passes the signed return value of `platform_get_irq()` to `devm_request_irq()` without checking for errors, causing negative error codes like `-EPROBE_DEFER` to be cast to large unsigned integers and replaced by `-EINVAL`, permanently breaking probe deferral.
- [High] The IRQ handler is registered before critical data structures (`od->pchans`) are allocated and before the hardware clock is enabled (`clk_prepare_enable`), risking a system crash or NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] The return value of `clk_prepare_enable()` is not checked. If the clock fails to enable, the driver silently registers the DMA controller, leading to a system crash when clients later attempt to use it.
- [High] During probe error paths, the clock is manually disabled while the devres-managed IRQ remains registered and active, creating a race condition that can cause a system crash.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH 08/26] dmaengine: owl-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe() ---
commit 8f8dd83b44c39b0ec6f44933f79e28cff3053a61
Author: Pan Chuang <panchuang@vivo.com>
dmaengine: owl-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
This commit removes driver-specific error logging around devm_request_irq()
since the core now automatically logs detailed error messages on failure.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> index 7c80572fc71d1..71d0b15968c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> @@ -1163,10 +1163,8 @@ static int owl_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> od->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, od->irq, owl_dma_interrupt, 0,
> dev_name(&pdev->dev), od);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to pass the unchecked return
value of platform_get_irq() directly to devm_request_irq()?
If platform_get_irq() returns a negative error code like -EPROBE_DEFER,
it gets cast to a large unsigned integer. This causes devm_request_irq()
to fail with -EINVAL, which permanently breaks probe deferral.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does requesting the IRQ here risk a crash?
The IRQ is unmasked before od->pchans is allocated and before the hardware
clock is enabled. If a spurious interrupt fires immediately,
owl_dma_interrupt() will attempt to access hardware registers and dereference
the uninitialized od->pchans pointer:
owl_dma_interrupt() {
pending = dma_readl(od, OWL_DMA_IRQ_PD0);
...
for_each_set_bit(i, &pending, od->nr_pchans) {
pchan = &od->pchans[i];
pchan_update(pchan, OWL_DMAX_INT_STATUS, 0xff, false);
}
}
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request IRQ\n");
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> /* Init physical channel */
> od->pchans = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, od->nr_pchans,
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but further down in owl_dma_probe(), is it
intended that the return value of clk_prepare_enable() is unchecked?
owl_dma_probe() {
...
clk_prepare_enable(od->clk);
ret = dma_async_device_register(&od->dma);
...
}
If the clock fails to enable, the driver silently registers the DMA
controller, which can lead to a system crash when clients later attempt
to use it and access unclocked hardware.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in owl_dma_probe()
leave a window for a crash?
owl_dma_probe() {
...
err_pool_free:
clk_disable_unprepare(od->clk);
dma_pool_destroy(od->lli_pool);
return ret;
}
The clock is manually disabled here, but the devres-managed IRQ remains
registered and active until the probe function returns and triggers devres
cleanup. If an interrupt fires during this window, the handler will access
unclocked hardware registers.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709135846.97972-1-panchuang@vivo.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 13:58 [PATCH 00/26] dmaengine: Remove redundant error messages on IRQ request failure Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/26] dmaengine: fsl-edma-main: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe() Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:33 ` Frank Li
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/26] dmaengine: fsl-qdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:34 ` Frank Li
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/26] dmaengine: loongson-loongson1-apb-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/26] dmaengine: mediatek-mtk-cqdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/26] dmaengine: mediatek-mtk-hsdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/26] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/26] dmaengine: moxart-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/26] dmaengine: owl-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/26] dmaengine: pxa_dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/26] dmaengine: qcom-gpi: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 11/26] dmaengine: sf-pdma-sf-pdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 12/26] dmaengine: sh-rcar-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 13/26] dmaengine: sh-rz-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 14/26] dmaengine: sh-shdmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 15/26] dmaengine: sh-usb-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 16/26] dmaengine: sprd-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 17/26] dmaengine: st_fdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 18/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 19/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-dma3: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 20/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-mdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 21/26] dmaengine: sun4i-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 22/26] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 23/26] dmaengine: tegra20-apb-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 24/26] dmaengine: ti-edma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 25/26] dmaengine: uniphier-xdmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 26/26] dmaengine: xgene-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:26 ` [PATCH 00/26] dmaengine: Remove redundant error messages on IRQ request failure Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709141608.21C001F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=panchuang@vivo.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox