From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pan Chuang" <panchuang@vivo.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/26] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:39:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709143958.8D7991F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709135846.97972-27-panchuang@vivo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Incomplete removal of redundant error messages for `devm_request_irq()` failures.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect channel index used during IRQ rollback path in `xgene_dma_request_irqs()`, leading to multiple kernel warnings and failed rollback.
- [High] Race condition in probe sequence causes NULL pointer dereference via uninitialized tasklet.
- [High] Probe error path fails to disable DMA hardware, leading to potential memory corruption.
--
--- Patch [26]: [PATCH 26/26] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe() ---
commit b27e7ae82dbb69011f33590c87faea09bb044017
Author: Pan Chuang <panchuang@vivo.com>
dmaengine: xgene-dma: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
The devm_request_irq() now automatically logs detailed error messages on
failure. This eliminates the need for driver-specific dev_err() and
dev_err_probe() calls that previously printed generic messages.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> --- a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> @@ -1436,11 +1436,8 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct xgene_dma *pdma)
> /* Register DMA error irq */
> ret = devm_request_irq(pdma->dev, pdma->err_irq, xgene_dma_err_isr,
> 0, "dma_error", pdma);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pdma->dev,
> - "Failed to register error IRQ %d\n", pdma->err_irq);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> /* Register DMA channel rx irq */
> for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL; i++) {
> chan = &pdma->chan[i];
> irq_set_status_flags(chan->rx_irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> ret = devm_request_irq(chan->dev, chan->rx_irq,
> xgene_dma_chan_ring_isr,
> 0, chan->name, chan);
> if (ret) {
> chan_err(chan, "Failed to register Rx IRQ %d\n",
> chan->rx_irq);
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states that the patch eliminates driver-specific error
logs for devm_request_irq failures because the core now logs them
automatically.
While the patch removes the dev_err for the global error IRQ above, it
appears to miss this chan_err macro for the Rx IRQ registration failure.
Should this chan_err also be removed to fully align with the commit message?
> devm_free_irq(pdma->dev, pdma->err_irq, pdma);
>
> for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> chan = &pdma->chan[i];
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a typo in the rollback
loop in xgene_dma_request_irqs.
It assigns chan using the outer loop index i instead of the inner loop
index j. Will this cause devm_free_irq to be called multiple times on an
unregistered IRQ and fail to clear the IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the
successfully registered ones?
> irq_clear_status_flags(chan->rx_irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> devm_free_irq(chan->dev, chan->rx_irq, chan);
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at the probe sequence
in xgene_dma_probe:
drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c:xgene_dma_probe() {
...
ret = xgene_dma_request_irqs(pdma);
if (ret)
goto err_request_irq;
/* Configure and enable DMA engine */
xgene_dma_init_hw(pdma);
/* Register DMA device with linux async framework */
ret = xgene_dma_init_async(pdma);
...
}
The function xgene_dma_request_irqs is called before the hardware is unmasked
in xgene_dma_init_hw. If a hardware interrupt fires immediately after
xgene_dma_init_hw, xgene_dma_chan_ring_isr will execute and unconditionally
schedule the tasklet:
drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c:xgene_dma_chan_ring_isr() {
...
tasklet_schedule(&chan->tasklet);
}
However, chan->tasklet is not set up until xgene_dma_init_async runs later
in the probe sequence. Can this trigger a NULL pointer dereference by
scheduling an uninitialized tasklet?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but looking at the error handling path
in xgene_dma_probe:
drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c:xgene_dma_probe() {
...
err_async_init:
xgene_dma_free_irqs(pdma);
err_request_irq:
for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL; i++)
xgene_dma_delete_chan_rings(&pdma->chan[i]);
...
}
If xgene_dma_init_async fails, the code jumps to err_async_init and frees
software resources and DMA descriptor ring buffers.
This path does not appear to call xgene_dma_disable or
xgene_dma_mask_interrupts. Could this leave the DMA controller actively
running and pointing at freed memory, potentially causing memory corruption
if the hardware continues to process descriptors?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709135846.97972-1-panchuang@vivo.com?part=26
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 13:58 [PATCH 00/26] dmaengine: Remove redundant error messages on IRQ request failure Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/26] dmaengine: fsl-edma-main: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe() Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:33 ` Frank Li
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/26] dmaengine: fsl-qdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:34 ` Frank Li
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/26] dmaengine: loongson-loongson1-apb-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/26] dmaengine: mediatek-mtk-cqdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/26] dmaengine: mediatek-mtk-hsdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/26] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/26] dmaengine: moxart-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/26] dmaengine: owl-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/26] dmaengine: pxa_dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/26] dmaengine: qcom-gpi: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 11/26] dmaengine: sf-pdma-sf-pdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 12/26] dmaengine: sh-rcar-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 13/26] dmaengine: sh-rz-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 14/26] dmaengine: sh-shdmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 15/26] dmaengine: sh-usb-dmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 16/26] dmaengine: sprd-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 17/26] dmaengine: st_fdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 18/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 19/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-dma3: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 20/26] dmaengine: stm32-stm32-mdma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 21/26] dmaengine: sun4i-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 22/26] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 23/26] dmaengine: tegra20-apb-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 24/26] dmaengine: ti-edma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 25/26] dmaengine: uniphier-xdmac: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH 26/26] dmaengine: xgene-dma: " Pan Chuang
2026-07-09 14:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 14:26 ` [PATCH 00/26] dmaengine: Remove redundant error messages on IRQ request failure Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709143958.8D7991F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=panchuang@vivo.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox