DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] dma: fsl_raid: convert descriptor stores to big-endian
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:44:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716204451.DE17C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716202949.677290-2-rosenp@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Bitwise OR operation on a __be32 field using a host-endian constant introduces data corruption.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete endianness conversion for command descriptor blocks leaves the driver broken on little-endian platforms.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCHv2 1/4] dma: fsl_raid: convert descriptor stores to big-endian ---
commit 4b4dfb0a314d465959f6268650dc8a30d7c69bd2
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

dma: fsl_raid: convert descriptor stores to big-endian

The descriptor structs (fsl_re_cmpnd_frame / fsl_re_hw_desc) are
in-memory but their fields are __be32, because the structures are handed
to the device as big-endian. The driver stored CPU-endian u32 values
into them directly, which is both wrong (the engine would see
byte-swapped lengths/addresses) and flagged by sparse as a base-type
mismatch. Wrap those stores in cpu_to_be32().

Fixes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202008111749.yy85rFMD%25lkp@intel.com/

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> index 99945845d8b5e..2778d07a05e86 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> @@ -242,9 +242,9 @@ static void fill_cfd_frame(struct fsl_re_cmpnd_frame *cf, u8 index,
>  	u32 efrl = length & FSL_RE_CF_LENGTH_MASK;
>  
>  	efrl |= final << FSL_RE_CF_FINAL_SHIFT;
> -	cf[index].efrl32 = efrl;
> -	cf[index].addr_high = upper_32_bits(addr);
> -	cf[index].addr_low = lower_32_bits(addr);
> +	cf[index].efrl32 = cpu_to_be32(efrl);

[Severity: High]
Since this function now writes a big-endian value to efrl32, doesn't this
cause a regression later when a host-endian bitwise OR is applied?

In fsl_re_prep_dma_genq():

	/* Setting the final bit in the last source buffer frame in CFD */
	cf[i - 1].efrl32 |= 1 << FSL_RE_CF_FINAL_SHIFT;

Since efrl32 now contains a byte-swapped value on little-endian architectures,
won't this host-endian bitwise OR place the final flag in the wrong byte and
corrupt the lower bits of the length field? 

The same pattern also occurs in fsl_re_prep_dma_pq().

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while you are fixing endianness, should the
cdb32 field in the command descriptor blocks also be converted?

For example, in fsl_re_prep_dma_genq():

	xor = desc->cdb_addr;
	xor->cdb32 = cdb;

And similarly in fsl_re_prep_dma_pq() and fsl_re_prep_dma_memcpy(), a
host-endian u32 is assigned directly to the __be32 cdb32 field. Doesn't this
leave the driver broken on little-endian platforms?

> +	cf[index].addr_high = cpu_to_be32(upper_32_bits(addr));
> +	cf[index].addr_low = cpu_to_be32(lower_32_bits(addr));
>  }

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716202949.677290-2-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 20:29 [PATCHv2 0/4] dma: fsl_raid: fix sparse warnings and simplify probing Rosen Penev
2026-07-16 20:29 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] dma: fsl_raid: convert descriptor stores to big-endian Rosen Penev
2026-07-16 20:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-16 20:49   ` Frank Li
2026-07-16 20:29 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] dma: fsl_raid: set final bit via fill_cfd_frame() argument Rosen Penev
2026-07-16 20:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 20:57   ` Frank Li
2026-07-16 20:29 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] dma: fsl_raid: keep MMIO bases as void __iomem and cast at access Rosen Penev
2026-07-16 20:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 21:02   ` Frank Li
2026-07-16 20:29 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] dma: fsl_raid: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource Rosen Penev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716204451.DE17C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox