From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Golla Nagendra" <nagendra.golla@amd.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:10:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814051050.B685F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814045616.1661199-7-nagendra.golla@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing hardware context restore on system resume leads to DMA data corruption.
- [High] DMA descriptor structures lack explicit little-endian types, breaking on big-endian kernels.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent ---
commit 85ed10a27c3d9299f4dbcb91c70a55052ad9638d
Author: Golla Nagendra <nagendra.golla@amd.com>
dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent
Use of_dma_is_coherent() instead of parsing the common dma-coherent
device-tree property directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c
> index 5e81e0d950e8f..194abfd6cb25d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -947,7 +948,7 @@ static int zynqmp_dma_chan_probe(struct zynqmp_dma_device *zdev,
> if (match_data)
> chan->irq_offset = match_data->offset;
>
> - chan->is_dmacoherent = of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent");
> + chan->is_dmacoherent = of_dma_is_coherent(node);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the system resume path fail to
restore the DMA hardware register context?
A system suspend-to-RAM cycle causes the PM domain to power off, which
wipes the DMA register context. Upon resume, zynqmp_dma_resume() calls
pm_runtime_force_resume():
drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c:zynqmp_dma_resume() {
...
if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
return pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
...
}
This re-enables clocks but doesn't call zynqmp_dma_init() to restore
critical registers like ZYNQMP_DMA_DSCR_ATTR and ZYNQMP_DMA_DATA_ATTR.
Will subsequent DMA transfers proceed with non-coherent hardware defaults
and silently bypass CPU cache snooping?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but are the hardware descriptor fields
missing explicit little-endian types?
The hardware descriptor layout uses native C types instead of __le32 and
__le64:
struct zynqmp_dma_desc_ll {
u64 addr;
u32 size;
u32 ctrl;
u64 nxtdscraddr;
u64 rsvd;
};
When the driver is built on a big-endian architecture (like ARM64 with
CPU_BIG_ENDIAN), the native assignments in zynqmp_dma_config_sg_ll_desc()
will store values in big-endian format:
drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c:zynqmp_dma_config_sg_ll_desc() {
...
sdesc->size = ddesc->size = len;
sdesc->addr = src;
ddesc->addr = dst;
...
}
Could the little-endian ZynqMP DMA hardware misinterpret these swapped
sizes and addresses, leading to corrupted DMA transfers and memory corruption?
> zdev->chan = chan;
> tasklet_setup(&chan->tasklet, zynqmp_dma_do_tasklet);
> spin_lock_init(&chan->lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814045616.1661199-1-nagendra.golla@amd.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 4:56 [PATCH V2 0/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix error paths and follow-up cleanups Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix PM rollback on sw_desc_pool alloc failure Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 5:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Free sw_desc_pool on desc_pool_v " Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 5:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix chan probe/remove error handling Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix stale kerneldoc comments Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 5:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix minor whitespace Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 5:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Reject zero-length memcpy transfers Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14 4:56 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Remove unused define and duplicate IRQ bit Golla Nagendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814051050.B685F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagendra.golla@amd.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox