DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Verma, Devendra" <devverma@amd.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, frank.li@kernel.org,
	den@valinux.co.jp, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	michal.simek@amd.com, devverma@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:54:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a80a43ce-a291-49f6-baf3-aa1340a3aca2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amjLTTa-OYtjiP1W@SMW015318>



On 28-Jul-26 21:01, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 02:47:42PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
>> Xilinx specific macros for MDB device can be reused for the
>> Xilinx supported other similar IP such as CPM6.
>> Renamed the Xilinx specific macros in a way that can be
>> reused for Xilinx supported upcoming IP, CPM6.
>> Naming is in accordance with the naming done for Synopsys macros.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v1:
>>     o No change
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 58 +++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>> index 791c46e8ae4c..ec5e057a0f11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>> @@ -29,21 +29,21 @@
>>   #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_XILINX_B054		0xb054
>>   #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_XILINX_B00F		0xb00f
>>
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_ID		0x6
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_ID		0x20
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR		GENMASK(10, 8)
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_MAP		GENMASK(2, 0)
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH	GENMASK(9, 0)
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH	GENMASK(25, 16)
>> -
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH	0xc
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW	0x8
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR		(~0ULL)
>> -
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_OFF_GAP		0x200000
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_SIZE		0x800
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_OFF_GAP		0x100000
>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_SIZE		0x800
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_ID		0x6
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_ID			0x20
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR		GENMASK(10, 8)
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_MAP		GENMASK(2, 0)
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH		GENMASK(9, 0)
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH		GENMASK(25, 16)
> 
> v1, you agree keep use old MDB ?
> 
> Frank
> 

I followed the suggestion you provided at the given link at the end.
Talking of Xilinx based devices, the channel separation is fixed for MDB
but not for CPM6. So, I have have renamed the specific functionality
specific to CPM6 in 2/3 of the same patch series.

This one cleans up the MDB references and makes the functionality 
generic for all the Xilinx devices.

Suggestion: https://lore.kernel.org/all/amI09ZcfhX4SEPIH@SMW015318/

CPM6 specific declaration:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260728091744.1086942-3-devverma@amd.com/

- Devendra

> 
>> +
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH	0xc
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW	0x8
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR		(~0ULL)
>> +
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_OFF_GAP		0x200000
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_SIZE			0x800
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_OFF_GAP		0x100000
>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_SIZE			0x800
>>
>>   #define DW_BLOCK(a, b, c) \
>>   	{ \
>> @@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	u16 vsec;
>>   	u64 off;
>>
>> -	pdata->devmem_phys_off = DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR;
>> +	pdata->devmem_phys_off = DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR;
>>
>>   	vsec = pci_find_vsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX,
>> -					DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_ID);
>> +					DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_ID);
>>   	if (!vsec)
>>   		return;
>>
>> @@ -272,18 +272,18 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>
>>   	pci_dbg(pdev, "Detected Xilinx PCIe Vendor-Specific Extended Capability DMA\n");
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0x8, &val);
>> -	map = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_MAP, val);
>> +	map = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_MAP, val);
>>   	if (map != EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
>>   		return;
>>
>>   	pdata->mf = map;
>> -	pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
>> +	pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
>>
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0xc, &val);
>>   	pdata->wr_ch_cnt = min(pdata->wr_ch_cnt,
>> -			       FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val));
>> +			       FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val));
>>   	pdata->rd_ch_cnt = min(pdata->rd_ch_cnt,
>> -			       FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val));
>> +			       FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val));
>>
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0x14, &val);
>>   	off = val;
>> @@ -293,16 +293,16 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	pdata->rg.off = off;
>>
>>   	vsec = pci_find_vsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX,
>> -					DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_ID);
>> +					DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_ID);
>>   	if (!vsec)
>>   		return;
>>
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
>> -			      vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH,
>> +			      vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH,
>>   			      &val);
>>   	off = val;
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
>> -			      vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW,
>> +			      vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW,
>>   			      &val);
>>   	off <<= 32;
>>   	off |= val;
>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   		 * address use the non-LL mode or simple mode supported by
>>   		 * the HDMA IP.
>>   		 */
>> -		if (vsec_data->devmem_phys_off == DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR)
>> +		if (vsec_data->devmem_phys_off == DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR)
>>   			non_ll = true;
>>
>>   		/*
>> @@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   		 */
>>   		if (!non_ll)
>>   			dw_edma_set_chan_region_offset(vsec_data, BAR_2, 0,
>> -						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_OFF_GAP,
>> -						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_SIZE,
>> -						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_OFF_GAP,
>> -						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_SIZE);
>> +						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_OFF_GAP,
>> +						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_SIZE,
>> +						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_OFF_GAP,
>> +						       DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_SIZE);
>>   	}
>>
>>   	/* Mapping PCI BAR regions */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28  9:17 [PATCH v2 0/3] CPM6 Channel Separation Support Devendra K Verma
2026-07-28  9:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic Devendra K Verma
2026-07-28  9:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:31   ` Frank Li
2026-07-31 16:24     ` Verma, Devendra [this message]
2026-07-31 19:20       ` Frank Li
2026-07-28  9:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC Devendra K Verma
2026-07-28  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:33   ` Frank Li
2026-07-31 10:52     ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-31 15:34       ` Frank Li
2026-07-31 16:33         ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-31 19:05           ` Frank Li
2026-07-28  9:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation Devendra K Verma
2026-07-28  9:31   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a80a43ce-a291-49f6-baf3-aa1340a3aca2@amd.com \
    --to=devverma@amd.com \
    --cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.li@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox