From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] dmaengine: Add API function dmaengine_prep_slave_dma_vec()
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:29:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdfa480e2e702e4e0e96269ac579f2ee750f1fc1.camel@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZYRWbROAuMXftH07@matsya>
Hi Vinod,
Le jeudi 21 décembre 2023 à 20:44 +0530, Vinod Koul a écrit :
> On 19-12-23, 18:50, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > This function can be used to initiate a scatter-gather DMA
> > transfer,
> > where the address and size of each segment is located in one entry
> > of
> > the dma_vec array.
> >
> > The major difference with dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() is that it
> > supports
> > specifying the lengths of each DMA transfer; as trying to override
> > the
> > length of the transfer with dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() is a very
> > tedious
> > process. The introduction of a new API function is also justified
> > by the
> > fact that scatterlists are on their way out.
> >
> > Note that dmaengine_prep_interleaved_dma() is not helpful either in
> > that
> > case, as it assumes that the address of each segment will be higher
> > than
> > the one of the previous segment, which we just cannot guarantee in
> > case
> > of a scatter-gather transfer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> >
> > ---
> > v3: New patch
> >
> > v5: Replace with function dmaengine_prep_slave_dma_vec(), and
> > struct
> > 'dma_vec'.
> > Note that at some point we will need to support cyclic
> > transfers
> > using dmaengine_prep_slave_dma_vec(). Maybe with a new "flags"
> > parameter to the function?
> > ---
> > include/linux/dmaengine.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > index 3df70d6131c8..ee5931ddb42f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > @@ -160,6 +160,16 @@ struct dma_interleaved_template {
> > struct data_chunk sgl[];
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct dma_vec - DMA vector
> > + * @addr: Bus address of the start of the vector
> > + * @len: Length in bytes of the DMA vector
> > + */
> > +struct dma_vec {
> > + dma_addr_t addr;
> > + size_t len;
> > +};
>
> so you want to transfer multiple buffers, right? why not use
> dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(). If there is reason for not using that one?
Well I think I answer that in the commit message, don't I?
> Furthermore I missed replying to your email earlier on use of
> dmaengine_prep_interleaved_dma(), my apologies.
> That can be made to work for you as well. Please see the notes where
> icg
> can be ignored and it does not need icg value to be set
>
> Infact, interleaved api can be made to work in most of these cases I
> can
> think of...
So if I want to transfer 16 bytes from 0x10, then 16 bytes from 0x0,
then 16 bytes from 0x20, how should I configure the
dma_interleaved_template?
Cheers,
-Paul
> > +
> > /**
> > * enum dma_ctrl_flags - DMA flags to augment operation
> > preparation,
> > * control completion, and communicate status.
> > @@ -910,6 +920,10 @@ struct dma_device {
> > struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *(*device_prep_dma_interrupt)(
> > struct dma_chan *chan, unsigned long flags);
> >
> > + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *(*device_prep_slave_dma_vec)(
> > + struct dma_chan *chan, const struct dma_vec *vecs,
> > + size_t nents, enum dma_transfer_direction
> > direction,
> > + unsigned long flags);
> > struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *(*device_prep_slave_sg)(
> > struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> > unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction
> > direction,
> > @@ -972,6 +986,17 @@ static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *dmaengine_prep_slave_single(
> > dir, flags,
> > NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *dmaengine_prep_slave_dma_vec(
> > + struct dma_chan *chan, const struct dma_vec *vecs, size_t
> > nents,
> > + enum dma_transfer_direction dir, unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + if (!chan || !chan->device || !chan->device-
> > >device_prep_slave_dma_vec)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return chan->device->device_prep_slave_dma_vec(chan, vecs,
> > nents,
> > + dir,
> > flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(
> > struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist
> > *sgl, unsigned int sg_len,
> > enum dma_transfer_direction dir, unsigned long flags)
> > --
> > 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 17:50 [PATCH v5 0/8] iio: new DMABUF based API, v5 Paul Cercueil
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of outgoing queue Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 11:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 11:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] dmaengine: Add API function dmaengine_prep_slave_dma_vec() Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 15:14 ` Vinod Koul
2023-12-21 15:29 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2024-01-08 12:20 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-22 11:06 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Vinod Koul
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: Implement device_prep_slave_dma_vec Paul Cercueil
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 12:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 17:21 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-25 13:47 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-27 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-29 12:52 ` Christian König
2024-01-29 13:06 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-29 13:17 ` Christian König
2024-01-29 13:32 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-29 14:15 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-08 13:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] iio: buffer-dma: Enable support for DMABUFs Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 16:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-22 8:56 ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-26 15:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support new DMABUF based userspace API Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 16:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 17:30 ` Paul Cercueil
2023-12-22 8:58 ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-26 15:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2023-12-21 16:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 16:30 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] iio: new DMABUF based API, v5 Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 17:56 ` Paul Cercueil
2023-12-26 15:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-08 21:12 ` Andrew Davis
2024-01-11 9:20 ` Paul Cercueil
2024-01-11 17:30 ` Andrew Davis
2024-01-12 11:33 ` Paul Cercueil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdfa480e2e702e4e0e96269ac579f2ee750f1fc1.camel@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox