From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
<yangxingui@huawei.com>, <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:51:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416085146.7c268cb8@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416030612.2379407-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:05:57 +0800
Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
> This patch series reworks the lcore ID verification logic within the power
> library to ensure consistency and improve maintainability. Currently, various
> cpufreq drivers implement their own lcore ID checks, often relying on simple
> range checks that do not account for whether a core is actually enabled in
> the application.
>
> Key Changes:
> 1. Replaces basic range checks with rte_lcore_is_enabled() across all
> cpufreq drivers (ACPI, AMD P-state, CPPC, Intel P-state, and KVM VM).
> This ensures the power library only operates on lcores assigned to the
> application.
> 2. Introduces a common macro in the power library's internal headers to
> standardize lcore ID verification.
> 3. Moves the verification logic from individual driver implementations up
> to the high-level framework API. This reduces duplication code and
> ensures that all drivers benefit from uniform validation.
> 4. Updates the power QoS and PMD Management libraries to use the new macro.
>
> Huisong Li (15):
> power/kvm_vm: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power/acpi_cpufreq: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power/amd_pstate: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power/cppc_cpufreq: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power/intel_pstate: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power: enforce enabled lcore ID check
> power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID
> power/pmd_mgmt: replace lcore ID verification with new macro
> power/qos: replace the lcore ID verification with new macro
> power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework
> power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID
> power/amd_pstate: remove the verification of lcore ID
> power/cppc_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID
> power/intel_pstate: remove the verification of lcore ID
> power/kvm_vm: remove the verification of lcore ID
>
> drivers/power/acpi/acpi_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
> drivers/power/amd_pstate/amd_pstate_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
> drivers/power/cppc/cppc_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
> .../power/intel_pstate/intel_pstate_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
> drivers/power/kvm_vm/kvm_vm.c | 10 ---
> lib/power/power_common.h | 7 ++
> lib/power/rte_power_cpufreq.c | 14 ++++
> lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c | 25 ++-----
> lib/power/rte_power_qos.c | 10 +--
> 9 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-)
>
Patch 3 did not get sent in the series maybe too big or mail issue?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 3:05 [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] power/kvm_vm: enforce enabled lcore ID check Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-17 2:51 ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 11:07 ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 14:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-22 9:18 ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] power: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] power/pmd_mgmt: replace lcore ID verification with new macro Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] power/qos: replace the " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 3:06 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-04-17 2:53 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification lihuisong (C)
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 01/15] eal: add interface to check if lcore is EAL managed Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 02/15] power/kvm_vm: validate lcore role in cpufreq API Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 03/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 04/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 05/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 06/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 08/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 09/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 10/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 11/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 12/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 13/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 14/15] power: allow the service core to config power QoS Huisong Li
2026-05-07 2:42 ` [PATCH V2 15/15] power: add lcore ID check for PMD mgmt Huisong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260416085146.7c268cb8@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox