DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
	<dev@dpdk.org>,  <thomas@monjalon.net>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
	<yangxingui@huawei.com>,  <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:53:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f28d51f-5af7-4561-a65b-14da05a0a26f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416085146.7c268cb8@phoenix.local>


On 4/16/2026 11:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:05:57 +0800
> Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch series reworks the lcore ID verification logic within the power
>> library to ensure consistency and improve maintainability. Currently, various
>> cpufreq drivers implement their own lcore ID checks, often relying on simple
>> range checks that do not account for whether a core is actually enabled in
>> the application.
>>
>> Key Changes:
>> 1. Replaces basic range checks with rte_lcore_is_enabled() across all
>>     cpufreq drivers (ACPI, AMD P-state, CPPC, Intel P-state, and KVM VM).
>>     This ensures the power library only operates on lcores assigned to the
>>     application.
>> 2. Introduces a common macro in the power library's internal headers to
>>     standardize lcore ID verification.
>> 3. Moves the verification logic from individual driver implementations up
>>     to the high-level framework API. This reduces duplication code and
>>     ensures that all drivers benefit from uniform validation.
>> 4. Updates the power QoS and PMD Management libraries to use the new macro.
>>
>> Huisong Li (15):
>>    power/kvm_vm: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power/acpi_cpufreq: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power/amd_pstate: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power/cppc_cpufreq: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power/intel_pstate: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power: enforce enabled lcore ID check
>>    power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID
>>    power/pmd_mgmt: replace lcore ID verification with new macro
>>    power/qos: replace the lcore ID verification with new macro
>>    power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework
>>    power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID
>>    power/amd_pstate: remove the verification of lcore ID
>>    power/cppc_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID
>>    power/intel_pstate: remove the verification of lcore ID
>>    power/kvm_vm: remove the verification of lcore ID
>>
>>   drivers/power/acpi/acpi_cpufreq.c             | 65 -------------------
>>   drivers/power/amd_pstate/amd_pstate_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
>>   drivers/power/cppc/cppc_cpufreq.c             | 65 -------------------
>>   .../power/intel_pstate/intel_pstate_cpufreq.c | 65 -------------------
>>   drivers/power/kvm_vm/kvm_vm.c                 | 10 ---
>>   lib/power/power_common.h                      |  7 ++
>>   lib/power/rte_power_cpufreq.c                 | 14 ++++
>>   lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c                | 25 ++-----
>>   lib/power/rte_power_qos.c                     | 10 +--
>>   9 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-)
>>
> Patch 3 did not get sent in the series maybe too big or mail issue?
It is in the series. I can see it in dpdk patch list.
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20260416030612.2379407-2-lihuisong@huawei.com/ 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16  3:05 [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] power/kvm_vm: enforce enabled lcore ID check Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-17  2:51     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 11:07       ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 14:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-22  9:18         ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] power: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] power/pmd_mgmt: replace lcore ID verification with new macro Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] power/qos: replace the " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:51 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-17  2:53   ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2026-05-07  2:42 ` [PATCH V2 " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 01/15] eal: add interface to check if lcore is EAL managed Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 02/15] power/kvm_vm: validate lcore role in cpufreq API Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 03/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 04/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 05/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 06/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 08/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 09/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 10/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 11/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 12/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 13/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 14/15] power: allow the service core to config power QoS Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 15/15] power: add lcore ID check for PMD mgmt Huisong Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f28d51f-5af7-4561-a65b-14da05a0a26f@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox