DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ring: convert to C11 atomics where practical
Date: Tue,  2 Jun 2026 10:07:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602171552.686349-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)

This is split out from the atomic deprecation series.
Convert lib/ring off rte_atomic32 and onto the C11 memory model,
except where C11 version has noticable performance drop
on x86 with GCC.

The pre-existing C11 and GCC-builtin paths lived in separate headers
with substantial duplication.  After this series, only the MP head
CAS (__rte_ring_headtail_move_head_mt) retains separate implementations;
everything else is shared.  Patch 2 documents the reason for
keeping the GCC builtin on the MP head CAS.

The default RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL selection per architecture is unchanged.

Stephen Hemminger (5):
  ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases
  ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32
  ring: use C11 for update_tail
  ring: drop unused arg to update_tail
  ring: use C11 for single thread move head

 lib/ring/meson.build                          |   2 +-
 lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h                   |  61 +++------
 lib/ring/rte_ring_elem_pvt.h                  | 116 ++++++++++++++++--
 ..._ring_generic_pvt.h => rte_ring_gcc_pvt.h} |  62 +++-------
 lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h              |   8 +-
 lib/ring/soring.c                             |  34 ++---
 6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
 rename lib/ring/{rte_ring_generic_pvt.h => rte_ring_gcc_pvt.h} (63%)

-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02 17:07 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:09   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32 Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:11   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-04 15:20     ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:43       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] ring: use C11 for update_tail Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:39   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] ring: drop unused arg to update_tail Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:40   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] ring: use C11 for single thread move head Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:41   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-04 16:32 ` [PATCH v2] ring: convert to C11 atomics where practical Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 16:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 16:32   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32 Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 16:32   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ring: cleanup the C11 code Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260602171552.686349-1-stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox