From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ring: convert to C11 atomics where practical
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:32:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604163656.1226902-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602171552.686349-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
This is split out from the atomic deprecation series. It converts lib/ring
off rte_atomic32 and onto the C11 memory model, except where the C11 version
has a noticeable performance drop on x86 with GCC.
The pre-existing C11 and GCC-builtin paths lived in separate headers with
substantial duplication. After this series, only the MP head CAS
(__rte_ring_headtail_move_head_mt) retains separate implementations;
everything else is shared. Patch 2 documents the reason for keeping the GCC
builtin on the MP head CAS.
The default RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL selection per architecture is unchanged.
v2 - consolidate cleanup patches
- fix the memory order on first load in _st case.
it was going back/forth across the patches
Stephen Hemminger (3):
ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases
ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32
ring: cleanup the C11 code
lib/ring/meson.build | 2 +-
lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h | 62 +++-------
lib/ring/rte_ring_elem_pvt.h | 116 ++++++++++++++++--
..._ring_generic_pvt.h => rte_ring_gcc_pvt.h} | 58 +++------
lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h | 8 +-
lib/ring/soring.c | 34 ++---
6 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
rename lib/ring/{rte_ring_generic_pvt.h => rte_ring_gcc_pvt.h} (65%)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 17:07 [PATCH 0/5] ring: convert to C11 atomics where practical Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:09 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32 Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:11 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-04 15:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:43 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] ring: use C11 for update_tail Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:39 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] ring: drop unused arg to update_tail Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:40 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] ring: use C11 for single thread move head Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 15:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-04 16:32 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-04 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ring: split single thread vs multi-thread cases Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ring: use GCC builtin as alternative to rte_atomic32 Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-04 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ring: cleanup the C11 code Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604163656.1226902-1-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox