DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	stable@dpdk.org, Samyak Jain <samyak.jain@amantyatech.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:05:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616210656.464062-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616210656.464062-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>

The reassembly code tracked only a running byte total and reserved slots
for the first and last fragments, with no check for a fragment
duplicating data already received. A single duplicate could destroy a
recoverable datagram:
 - a duplicate first or last fragment collided with the reserved slot and
   sent the whole entry down the error path, freeing every collected
   fragment;
 - a duplicate intermediate fragment was appended to a new slot, inflating
   frag_size past total_size so reassembly never completed.

RFC 791 reassembly tolerates duplicates: a fragment covering bytes
already present carries no new information. Check for an exact duplicate
(stored fragment with the same offset and length) and drop only that
mbuf, before frag_size is updated, leaving the entry's accounting
unchanged.

Overlapping fragments with differing bounds are a separate issue
addressed in the next patch.

Fixes: cc8f4d020c0b ("examples/ip_reassembly: initial import")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Reported-by: Samyak Jain <samyak.jain@amantyatech.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 lib/ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c b/lib/ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
index 382f42d0e1..9a03ef995a 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
@@ -89,7 +89,23 @@ struct rte_mbuf *
 ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
 	struct rte_mbuf *mb, uint16_t ofs, uint16_t len, uint16_t more_frags)
 {
-	uint32_t idx;
+	uint32_t i, idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * Discard an exact duplicate fragment. If a previously stored fragment
+	 * already covers the same offset and length, this fragment carries no
+	 * new data. Reassembly is tolerant of duplicates (RFC 791), so drop
+	 * only this mbuf and keep the reassembly entry intact rather than
+	 * treating it as an error. Fragments overlapping an existing one with
+	 * different bounds are not handled here.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i != fp->last_idx; i++) {
+		if (fp->frags[i].mb != NULL && fp->frags[i].ofs == ofs &&
+				fp->frags[i].len == len) {
+			IP_FRAG_MBUF2DR(dr, mb);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+	}
 
 	fp->frag_size += len;
 
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16 21:05 [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616210656.464062-2-stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=samyak.jain@amantyatech.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox