From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
stable@dpdk.org,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:05:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616210656.464062-5-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616210656.464062-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
DPDK version of IPv6 reassembly only handles a fragment header placed
directly after the IPv6 header. With other extension headers in the
unfragmentable part, ipv6_frag_reassemble() patches the wrong
next-header field, miscomputes the payload length, and shifts the
wrong bytes, corrupting the result.
Drop the fragment when l3_len covers more than the IPv6 and fragment
headers. RFC 8200 allows a receiver to discard packets whose extension
headers are not in the recommended order, and RFC 9099 recommends
dropping non-conforming fragmented IPv6 packets, so dropping here is
permitted rather than a deviation.
Fixes: 4f1a8f633862 ("ip_frag: add IPv6 reassembly")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
index 0e809a01e5..7c1659002b 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
@@ -180,6 +180,19 @@ rte_ipv6_frag_reassemble_packet(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
return NULL;
}
+ /*
+ * Only a fragment header directly following the IPv6 header is
+ * supported. Other extension headers in the unfragmentable part are
+ * not handled: ipv6_frag_reassemble() assumes l3_len covers exactly
+ * the IPv6 and fragment headers when it patches the next-header field
+ * and removes the fragment header. Drop the fragment rather than
+ * produce a corrupt datagram.
+ */
+ if (mb->l3_len != sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr) + sizeof(*frag_hdr)) {
+ IP_FRAG_MBUF2DR(dr, mb);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(trim > 0))
rte_pktmbuf_trim(mb, trim);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 21:05 [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616210656.464062-5-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox