From: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, stable@dpdk.org,
Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] net/enetc: fix TX BD structure
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:05:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622113517.1616028-2-g.singh@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622113517.1616028-1-g.singh@nxp.com>
The flags field in struct enetc_tx_bd was declared as uint16_t but
ENETC4 TX BDs only use an 8-bit flags byte. Fix the type to uint8_t
to match the hardware descriptor layout.
Fixes: 696fa399d797 ("net/enetc: add PMD with basic operations")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
---
drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h | 7 +++----
drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c | 17 +++++++++--------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h b/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
index 173d677..19efadd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018-2024 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2026 NXP
*/
#ifndef _ENETC_HW_H_
@@ -198,8 +198,7 @@ enum enetc_bdr_type {TX, RX};
#define ENETC_TX_ADDR(txq, addr) ((void *)((txq)->enetc_txbdr + (addr)))
-#define ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_IE BIT(13)
-#define ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F BIT(15)
+#define ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F BIT(7)
/* ENETC Parsed values (Little Endian) */
#define ENETC_PARSE_ERROR 0x8000
@@ -262,7 +261,7 @@ struct enetc_tx_bd {
uint8_t l3t:1;
uint8_t resv:5;
uint8_t l4t:3;
- uint16_t flags;
+ uint8_t flags;
};/* default layout */
uint32_t txstart;
uint32_t lstatus;
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
index a2b8153..d3b98b3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018-2024 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2026 NXP
*/
#include <stdbool.h>
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ enetc_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue,
tx_swbd = &tx_ring->q_swbd[i];
txbd->frm_len = tx_pkts[start]->pkt_len;
txbd->buf_len = txbd->frm_len;
- txbd->flags = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
+ txbd->flags = ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F;
txbd->addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
tx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off);
@@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ enetc4_tx_offload_checksum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf, struct enetc_tx_bd *txbd)
txbd->ipcs = ENETC4_TXBD_IPCS;
txbd->l3_start = mbuf->l2_len;
txbd->l3_hdr_size = mbuf->l3_len / 4;
- txbd->flags |= rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L_TX_CKSUM);
+ txbd->flags |= ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L_TX_CKSUM;
if ((mbuf->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM) == RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_CKSUM) {
- txbd->l4t = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_L4T_UDP);
- txbd->flags |= rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L4CS);
+ txbd->l4t = ENETC4_TXBD_L4T_UDP;
+ txbd->flags |= ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L4CS;
} else if ((mbuf->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM) == RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_CKSUM) {
- txbd->l4t = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_L4T_TCP);
- txbd->flags |= rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L4CS);
+ txbd->l4t = ENETC4_TXBD_L4T_TCP;
+ txbd->flags |= ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_L4CS;
}
}
}
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ enetc_xmit_pkts_nc(void *tx_queue,
dcbf(data + j);
txbd = ENETC_TXBD(*tx_ring, i);
- txbd->flags = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
+ txbd->flags = 0;
if (tx_ring->q_swbd[i].buffer_addr->ol_flags & ENETC4_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK)
enetc4_tx_offload_checksum(tx_ring->q_swbd[i].buffer_addr, txbd);
@@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ enetc_xmit_pkts_nc(void *tx_queue,
txbd->addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
tx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off);
+ txbd->flags |= ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_F;
i++;
start++;
if (unlikely(i == tx_ring->bd_count))
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 18:44 [PATCH 00/10] NXP ENETC driver related changes Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] net/enetc: fix TX BD structure Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] net/enetc: fix TX BDs flag overwrite issue Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] net/enetc: fix queue initialization Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] net/enetc: support ESP packet type in packet parsing Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] net/enetc: update random MAC generation code Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] net/enetc: support scatter-gather Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] net/enetc: add option to disable VSI messaging Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] net/enetc: add devargs to control VSI-PSI timeout and delay Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] net/enetc: set user configurable priority to TX rings Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] net/enetc4: add cacheable BD ring support with SW cache maintenance Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 21:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] NXP ENETC driver related changes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-22 11:36 ` Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] ENETC driver related changes series Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` Gagandeep Singh [this message]
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] net/enetc: fix queue initialization Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] net/enetc: support ESP packet type in packet parsing Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] net/enetc: update random MAC generation code Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] net/enetc: support scatter-gather Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] net/enetc: add option to disable VSI messaging Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] net/enetc: add devargs to control VSI-PSI timeout and delay Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] net/enetc: set user configurable priority to TX rings Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] net/enetc4: add cacheable BD ring support with SW cache maintenance Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-22 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] ENETC driver related changes series Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260622113517.1616028-2-g.singh@nxp.com \
--to=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox