From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] test/bpf: check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:58:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623135817.2246dfed@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c510bf24a3cd492693fc54f0b558656f@huawei.com>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:57:35 +0000
Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com> wrote:
> > + {
> > + struct rte_bpf_jit jit;
> > +
> > + rte_bpf_get_jit(bpf, &jit);
>
> Out of abundance of caution I would also prefill jit with zeroes and check the
> return code here.
Makes sense, but the test already was just doing same thing elsewhere:
static int
run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst)
{
int32_t ret, rv;
...
bpf = rte_bpf_load(&tst->prm);
...
/* repeat the same test with jit, when possible */
rte_bpf_get_jit(bpf, &jit);
if (jit.func != NULL) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 20:28 [PATCH 0/4] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-08 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] bpf/arm64: fix zero-return branch in multi-exit programs Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-17 18:03 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-08 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] test: bpf check that JIT was generated Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-17 18:09 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-08 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] test: bpf check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-17 18:14 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-08 20:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-17 19:35 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-17 17:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Marat Khalili
2026-06-17 21:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: JIT related bug fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] bpf/x86: fix JIT encoding of BPF_JSET with immediate Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-19 2:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] test/bpf: add JSET test with small immediate Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] bpf/arm64: fix offset type to allow a negative jump Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] test/bpf: check that JIT was generated Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 20:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] test/bpf: check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] bpf: JIT related bug fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] bpf/x86: fix JIT encoding of BPF_JSET with immediate Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 10:11 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] test/bpf: add JSET test with small immediate Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 10:16 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] bpf/arm64: fix offset type to allow a negative jump Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-22 16:26 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] test/bpf: check that JIT was generated Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-21 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] test/bpf: check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 13:57 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-23 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 20:58 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] bpf: JIT related bug fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] bpf/x86: fix JIT encoding of fixed-width immediates Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] test/bpf: add JSET test with small immediate Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] test/bpf: add test for large shift Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] bpf/arm64: fix offset type to allow a negative jump Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] test/bpf: check that JIT was generated Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] test/bpf: check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623135817.2246dfed@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox