* [PATCH] net/gve: fix redundant comparison of qpl_bufs with null
@ 2026-09-25 13:16 Konyukhov Aleksandr
2026-09-26 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Konyukhov Aleksandr @ 2026-09-25 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen de Borst, Rushil Gupta, Joshua Washington,
Praveen Kaligineedi
Cc: dev, stable, Konyukhov Aleksandr
Memory allocation for qpl->mz and qpl->qpl_bufs occurs in the
gve_alloc_queue_page_list() function under the condition
if(is_rx) qpl_bufs = rte_zmalloc else mz = gve_alloc_using_mz.
Accordingly, if qpl->mz == NULL, then memory allocation
for qpl->qpl_bufs definitely occurred. That is, in line
gve_ethdev.c:127, an additional check if (qpl->qpl_bufs)
is not required.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 9873a135bfba ("net/gve: allocate Rx QPL pages using malloc")
Cc: pkaligineedi@google.com
Signed-off-by: Konyukhov Aleksandr <Alexander.Konyukhov@kaspersky.com>
---
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
index 3596a0236d..b72359a9af 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ gve_free_queue_page_list(struct gve_queue_page_list *qpl)
if (qpl->mz) {
rte_memzone_free(qpl->mz);
qpl->mz = NULL;
- } else if (qpl->qpl_bufs) {
+ } else {
uint32_t i;
for (i = 0; i < qpl->num_entries; i++)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/gve: fix redundant comparison of qpl_bufs with null
2026-09-25 13:16 [PATCH] net/gve: fix redundant comparison of qpl_bufs with null Konyukhov Aleksandr
@ 2026-09-26 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2026-09-26 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konyukhov Aleksandr
Cc: Jeroen de Borst, Rushil Gupta, Joshua Washington,
Praveen Kaligineedi, dev, stable
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:16:41 +0300
Konyukhov Aleksandr <Alexander.Konyukhov@kaspersky.com> wrote:
> Memory allocation for qpl->mz and qpl->qpl_bufs occurs in the
> gve_alloc_queue_page_list() function under the condition
> if(is_rx) qpl_bufs = rte_zmalloc else mz = gve_alloc_using_mz.
> Accordingly, if qpl->mz == NULL, then memory allocation
> for qpl->qpl_bufs definitely occurred. That is, in line
> gve_ethdev.c:127, an additional check if (qpl->qpl_bufs)
> is not required.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 9873a135bfba ("net/gve: allocate Rx QPL pages using malloc")
> Cc: pkaligineedi@google.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Konyukhov Aleksandr <Alexander.Konyukhov@kaspersky.com>
> ---
NAK
AI review with better tooling finds this patch is bogus.
Review: [PATCH] net/gve: fix redundant comparison of qpl_bufs with null
Patchwork 170040
Error
-----
The premise of the patch is wrong. mz and qpl_bufs are members of an
anonymous union in struct gve_queue_page_list (gve_ethdev.h:76):
union {
const struct rte_memzone *mz; /* memzone allocated for TX queue */
void **qpl_bufs; /* RX qpl-buffer list allocated using malloc*/
};
They are the same word. That is what SVACE is reporting: in the else
branch qpl->mz == NULL already means qpl->qpl_bufs == NULL, so the
test is always false. The commit message has this backwards; the
allocation logic in gve_alloc_queue_page_list() is not what makes the
comparison redundant.
After the patch:
} else {
uint32_t i;
for (i = 0; i < qpl->num_entries; i++)
rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs[i]);
qpl->qpl_bufs is NULL in that branch, so every iteration dereferences
NULL. The branch is unreachable today (a successful alloc always leaves
the union non-NULL), so runtime behaviour is unchanged, but the patch
codifies a wrong reading of the struct and leaves the real bug in place
(see Info). Not a fix. Should be replaced by the union removal below.
Warning
-------
Fixes: 9873a135bfba does not exist in the upstream tree. The commit
"net/gve: allocate Rx QPL pages using malloc" is a71168a775e6 (v25.03).
Cc: stable@dpdk.org is on the mail but not in the commit body.
Info (pre-existing, introduced by a71168a775e6, not by this patch)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the union, gve_free_queue_page_list() never frees Rx pages.
For an Rx QPL, qpl_bufs is non-NULL, so qpl->mz reads non-NULL and the
first branch runs:
if (qpl->mz) {
rte_memzone_free(qpl->mz);
qpl->mz = NULL;
rte_memzone_free() is handed the rte_zmalloc'd pointer array;
rte_fbarray_find_idx() rejects it, the call returns -EINVAL (ignored),
and qpl->mz = NULL also clears qpl_bufs. The following
if (qpl->qpl_bufs) is then false. Every 4K page from
gve_alloc_using_malloc() and the qpl_bufs array itself leak on each Rx
queue release / teardown, and the per-page free loop is dead code.
Fix is to drop the union so the two pointers are independent:
dma_addr_t *page_buses; /* the dma addrs of the pages */
const struct rte_memzone *mz; /* Tx: memzone backing the pages */
void **qpl_bufs; /* Rx: per-page buffers from rte_malloc */
and simplify the free path:
if (qpl->mz) {
rte_memzone_free(qpl->mz);
qpl->mz = NULL;
}
if (qpl->qpl_bufs) {
for (i = 0; i < qpl->num_entries; i++)
rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs[i]);
rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs);
qpl->qpl_bufs = NULL;
}
Costs 8 bytes per QPL. That fix is the one that should carry the
Fixes: a71168a775e6 tag and Cc: stable@dpdk.org, since v25.03 and later
leak Rx QPL memory.
Review-Result: ERROR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-26 16:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-25 13:16 [PATCH] net/gve: fix redundant comparison of qpl_bufs with null Konyukhov Aleksandr
2026-09-26 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox