DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Marat Khalili <qm2k21@gmail.com>
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] bpf: remove redundant memory barrier on unload
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 12:50:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261011125016.15772f7c@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011182158.124246-6-qm2k21@gmail.com>

On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 18:21:53 +0000
Marat Khalili <qm2k21@gmail.com> wrote:

> In bpf_eth_cbi_unload(), rte_smp_mb() was called immediately before
> bpf_eth_cbi_wait(), which itself starts with rte_smp_mb().
> 
> Remove the redundant rte_smp_mb() call from bpf_eth_cbi_unload() and
> update the unload sequence diagram accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <qm2k21@gmail.com>
> ---
>  lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> index 7ee16cfa69..68671848e9 100644
> --- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> +++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,6 @@
>   *     |                      |               |              |              |                |
>   *   rte_smp_mb()             |               |              |              |                |
>   *     |                      |               |              |              |                |
> - *   rte_smp_mb()             |               |              |              |                |
> - *     |                      |               |              |              |                |
>   *     +-if use is odd        |               |              |              | if cb not NULL-+
>   *     | |                    |               |              |              |              | |
>   *     | +------------ fetch odd ------------>|              |              |<-- execute --+ |
> @@ -502,7 +500,6 @@ bpf_eth_cbi_unload(struct bpf_eth_cbi *bc)
>  {
>  	/* mark this cbi as empty */
>  	bc->cb = NULL;
> -	rte_smp_mb();
>  
>  	/* make sure datapath doesn't use bpf anymore, then destroy bpf */
>  	bpf_eth_cbi_wait(bc);

I think this already covered by:

https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20261008233649.1260843-2-stephen@networkplumber.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-11 18:21 [PATCH 0/9] bpf: clean up and document ethdev callback synchronization Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/9] bpf: document packet callback unload sequence Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/9] bpf: document ethdev callback threading limitations Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] bpf: reject Tx callback installation with MT_LOCKFREE Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] bpf: add callback flag to skip multi-thread check Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 19:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-11 20:12     ` Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] bpf: remove redundant memory barrier on unload Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 19:50   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-10-11 20:14     ` Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] bpf: simplify callback inuse tracking to boolean flag Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 19:51   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-11 20:17     ` Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 7/9] bpf: reformat packet callback unload diagram Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] bpf: use relaxed stores for callback inuse tracking Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 19:52   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-11 20:24     ` Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 18:21 ` [PATCH 9/9] bpf: make callback handle atomic with relaxed access Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 19:54   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-11 20:31     ` Marat Khalili
2026-10-11 20:29 ` [RFC] bpf: fix callback unload with concurrent Tx burst Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-12 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] bpf: clean up and document ethdev callback synchronization Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] bpf: document packet callback unload sequence Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 2/9] bpf: document ethdev callback threading limitations Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:44     ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] bpf: reject Tx callback installation with MT_LOCKFREE Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] bpf: remove redundant memory barrier on unload Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] bpf: simplify callback inuse tracking to boolean flag Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 6/9] bpf: reformat packet callback unload diagram Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] bpf: use relaxed accesses for callback inuse tracking Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] bpf: make callback handle atomic with relaxed access Marat Khalili
2026-10-12 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] bpf: add callback flag to skip multi-thread check Marat Khalili
2026-10-13 16:55     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261011125016.15772f7c@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=qm2k21@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox