DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, joshwash@google.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:08:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020080858.29d7e086@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com>

On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:20:02 -0400
Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com> wrote:

> GQI receives a frame larger than one Rx buffer as a chain of mbufs, but
> the driver doesn't report RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, and it chains
> whether or not the application enabled it. 1/2 reports SCATTER for GQI
> so an application that gates multi-segment receive on the capability,
> such as VPP, can turn it on. 2/2 refuses an Rx queue setup or an MTU
> change that would need scatter when the application hasn't enabled it.
> 
> Both patches change only the GQI queue format. DQO has a related
> problem that this series leaves alone: its Rx path ignores
> end_of_packet, so with Rx buffers smaller than the frame each buffer
> is delivered as its own packet. DQO should either chain those buffers
> or refuse that configuration too; that is left for a follow-up.
> 
> One more gap 2/2 doesn't close: the check reads dev->data->mtu, but gve
> never pushes that value to the device. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets it
> without calling mtu_set, so an application that never calls
> rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() passes the check at 1500 while the device keeps
> the MTU from its device descriptor, and on a jumbo VPC it can still get
> chained frames. Applying dev->data->mtu at configure or start would fix
> that but changes behavior and needs hardware to test, so it is left for
> the same follow-up.
> 
> v2:
> - add 2/2 to refuse MTUs that need scatter when it isn't enabled
>   (Stephen)
> - correct the DQO statement in 1/2

Applied to next-net

AI review had a followup suggestion:

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI

Applies to main; both commits build with -Dwerror=true.

Info

[PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it
is off

1. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets dev->data->mtu directly from
   rxmode.mtu without calling mtu_set, and keeps already set up Rx
   queues when the queue count is unchanged. So stop, reconfigure with
   a larger MTU (or without SCATTER), and start without redoing queue
   setup passes both checks. Moving the mtu_set loop into a helper and
   calling it from gve_dev_start() as well covers that path:

       static int
       gve_rx_check_scatter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
       {
               struct gve_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
               uint16_t i;

               if (!gve_is_gqi(priv) ||
                   (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
                    RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER))
                       return 0;

               for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
                       struct gve_rx_queue *q = dev->data->rx_queues[i];

                       if (q != NULL &&
                           gve_rx_gqi_needs_scatter(mtu, q->rx_buf_len)) {
                               PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
                                       "MTU %u needs Rx scatter", mtu);
                               return -EINVAL;
                       }
               }
               return 0;
       }

   Not required for this series; can be a follow up.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020080858.29d7e086@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=joshwash@google.com \
    --cc=rnwolfe@google.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox