From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, joshwash@google.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:08:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020080858.29d7e086@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:20:02 -0400
Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com> wrote:
> GQI receives a frame larger than one Rx buffer as a chain of mbufs, but
> the driver doesn't report RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, and it chains
> whether or not the application enabled it. 1/2 reports SCATTER for GQI
> so an application that gates multi-segment receive on the capability,
> such as VPP, can turn it on. 2/2 refuses an Rx queue setup or an MTU
> change that would need scatter when the application hasn't enabled it.
>
> Both patches change only the GQI queue format. DQO has a related
> problem that this series leaves alone: its Rx path ignores
> end_of_packet, so with Rx buffers smaller than the frame each buffer
> is delivered as its own packet. DQO should either chain those buffers
> or refuse that configuration too; that is left for a follow-up.
>
> One more gap 2/2 doesn't close: the check reads dev->data->mtu, but gve
> never pushes that value to the device. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets it
> without calling mtu_set, so an application that never calls
> rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() passes the check at 1500 while the device keeps
> the MTU from its device descriptor, and on a jumbo VPC it can still get
> chained frames. Applying dev->data->mtu at configure or start would fix
> that but changes behavior and needs hardware to test, so it is left for
> the same follow-up.
>
> v2:
> - add 2/2 to refuse MTUs that need scatter when it isn't enabled
> (Stephen)
> - correct the DQO statement in 1/2
Applied to next-net
AI review had a followup suggestion:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI
Applies to main; both commits build with -Dwerror=true.
Info
[PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it
is off
1. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets dev->data->mtu directly from
rxmode.mtu without calling mtu_set, and keeps already set up Rx
queues when the queue count is unchanged. So stop, reconfigure with
a larger MTU (or without SCATTER), and start without redoing queue
setup passes both checks. Moving the mtu_set loop into a helper and
calling it from gve_dev_start() as well covers that path:
static int
gve_rx_check_scatter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
{
struct gve_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
uint16_t i;
if (!gve_is_gqi(priv) ||
(dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER))
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
struct gve_rx_queue *q = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
if (q != NULL &&
gve_rx_gqi_needs_scatter(mtu, q->rx_buf_len)) {
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
"MTU %u needs Rx scatter", mtu);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
return 0;
}
Not required for this series; can be a follow up.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020080858.29d7e086@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=rnwolfe@google.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox