From: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: joshwash@google.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:20:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019022824.189319-1-rnwolfe@google.com>
GQI receives a frame larger than one Rx buffer as a chain of mbufs, but
the driver doesn't report RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, and it chains
whether or not the application enabled it. 1/2 reports SCATTER for GQI
so an application that gates multi-segment receive on the capability,
such as VPP, can turn it on. 2/2 refuses an Rx queue setup or an MTU
change that would need scatter when the application hasn't enabled it.
Both patches change only the GQI queue format. DQO has a related
problem that this series leaves alone: its Rx path ignores
end_of_packet, so with Rx buffers smaller than the frame each buffer
is delivered as its own packet. DQO should either chain those buffers
or refuse that configuration too; that is left for a follow-up.
One more gap 2/2 doesn't close: the check reads dev->data->mtu, but gve
never pushes that value to the device. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets it
without calling mtu_set, so an application that never calls
rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() passes the check at 1500 while the device keeps
the MTU from its device descriptor, and on a jumbo VPC it can still get
chained frames. Applying dev->data->mtu at configure or start would fix
that but changes behavior and needs hardware to test, so it is left for
the same follow-up.
v2:
- add 2/2 to refuse MTUs that need scatter when it isn't enabled
(Stephen)
- correct the DQO statement in 1/2
Ryan Wolfe (2):
net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format
net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off
.mailmap | 1 +
doc/guides/nics/features/gve.ini | 1 +
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h | 9 +++++++++
drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0.218.g1ec904b173-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` Ryan Wolfe [this message]
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com \
--to=rnwolfe@google.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox