DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Tengfei <zhtfdev@gmail.com>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, zaiyuwang@trustnetic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net/txgbe: fix FDIR Rx packet buffer handling
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:47:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54095ca6-afe3-4c28-bfce-4456d9e30e4b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <017d01dd5b7c$dedc3a30$9c94ae90$@trustnetic.com>

On 10/14/26 09:39, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zhang Tengfei <zhtfdev@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2026 10:00 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org; Zhang Tengfei <zhtfdev@gmail.com>; jiawenwu@trustnetic.com; zaiyuwang@trustnetic.com;
>> stephen@networkplumber.org; Zhang Tengfei <zhtfdev@gmail.com>; jiawenwu@trustnetic.com; zaiyuwang@trustnetic.com
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] net/txgbe: fix FDIR Rx packet buffer handling
>> The same issue was fixed in ixgbe:
>> <https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20260927042545.45152-1-zhtfdev@gmail.com>
>>
>> Compile tested only.
> 
> It should to be tested with the actual NICs.
> 


v2 is out. I do not have a txgbe NIC, so it is compile-tested
only.
Would you be able to test it on a txgbe NIC?

With the port started: create and delete one FDIR rule ten
times, then check that PBRXSIZE(0) (0x19020) does not keep
shrinking and that FDIRCTL (0x19500) is 0 after delete.
flow validate must not change either register. A rule with an
out-of-range queue must fail and leave them unchanged. flow
flush must restore PBRXSIZE(0). SP and AML if you have both.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 14:00 [PATCH 0/3] net/txgbe: fix FDIR Rx packet buffer handling Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-13 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] net/txgbe: fix Rx packet buffer size with flow director Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-13 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/txgbe: do not enable flow director on flow validate Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-13 14:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] net/txgbe: disable flow director when no rule is left Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-13 14:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] net/txgbe: fix FDIR Rx packet buffer handling Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-14 16:45   ` Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-14  1:39 ` Jiawen Wu
2026-10-14 16:47   ` Zhang Tengfei [this message]
2026-10-14 16:39 ` [PATCH v2 " Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-14 16:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] net/txgbe: fix Rx packet buffer size with flow director Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-14 16:39   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net/txgbe: do not enable flow director on flow validate Zhang Tengfei
2026-10-14 16:39   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] net/txgbe: disable flow director when no rule is left Zhang Tengfei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54095ca6-afe3-4c28-bfce-4456d9e30e4b@gmail.com \
    --to=zhtfdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=zaiyuwang@trustnetic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox