From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix TM node ID validation against configured queues
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:24:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag3SIFeXpwhWKocg@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520150717.365942-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 03:07:16PM +0000, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> The leaf node ID boundary is checked against the compile-time constant
> `RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT` (1024) rather than the number of configured Tx
> queues. The rte_tm specification reserves IDs 0 to N-1 for leaf nodes
> where N is the configured queue count, so using the constant produces
> wrong results whenever N is less than 1024.
>
> Fix by using `nb_tx_queues` as the boundary when queues have been
> configured, falling back to `RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT` when `nb_tx_queues`
> is zero. The zero case arises when the TM hierarchy is built before port
> queue configuration, which is required to support queue counts beyond
> the hardware default.
>
> Also add an explicit check in the non-leaf validation path that rejects
> IDs in the leaf-reserved range. This condition can be triggered two ways:
> adding a leaf node before its parent chain is complete (the node resolves
> to a non-leaf level), or assigning a leaf-range ID to a node intended
> as non-leaf.
>
> Fixes: 715d449a965b ("net/ice: enhance Tx scheduler hierarchy support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 12:31 [PATCH] net/ice: fix TM node ID validation against configured queues Ciara Loftus
2026-05-19 14:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-20 15:03 ` Loftus, Ciara
2026-05-20 15:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciara Loftus
2026-05-20 15:24 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2026-05-22 14:57 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag3SIFeXpwhWKocg@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox