DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix TM node ID validation against configured queues
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 15:57:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahBuwKgxU6gTontR@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ag3SIFeXpwhWKocg@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 03:07:16PM +0000, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > The leaf node ID boundary is checked against the compile-time constant
> > `RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT` (1024) rather than the number of configured Tx
> > queues. The rte_tm specification reserves IDs 0 to N-1 for leaf nodes
> > where N is the configured queue count, so using the constant produces
> > wrong results whenever N is less than 1024.
> > 
> > Fix by using `nb_tx_queues` as the boundary when queues have been
> > configured, falling back to `RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT` when `nb_tx_queues`
> > is zero. The zero case arises when the TM hierarchy is built before port
> > queue configuration, which is required to support queue counts beyond
> > the hardware default.
> > 
> > Also add an explicit check in the non-leaf validation path that rejects
> > IDs in the leaf-reserved range. This condition can be triggered two ways:
> > adding a leaf node before its parent chain is complete (the node resolves
> > to a non-leaf level), or assigning a leaf-range ID to a node intended
> > as non-leaf.
> > 
> > Fixes: 715d449a965b ("net/ice: enhance Tx scheduler hierarchy support")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> > ---
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks,
/Bruce

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05 12:31 [PATCH] net/ice: fix TM node ID validation against configured queues Ciara Loftus
2026-05-19 14:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-20 15:03   ` Loftus, Ciara
2026-05-20 15:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Ciara Loftus
2026-05-20 15:24   ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-22 14:57     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahBuwKgxU6gTontR@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox