[Drbd-dev] Re: [DRBD-cvs] r1611 - branches/drbd-0.7/drbd

[Drbd-dev] Re: [DRBD-cvs] r1611 - branches/drbd-0.7/drbd

[Philipp Reisner]

On Sunday 24 October 2004 13:20, svn@svn.drbd.org wrote:
> Author: lars
> Date: 2004-10-24 13:20:13 +0200 (Sun, 24 Oct 2004)
> New Revision: 1611
>
> Modified:
>    branches/drbd-0.7/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
> Log:
> * wake_up_interruptible did not wake up threads in wait_even(cstate)
> * down_interruptible in drbd_send_handshake, just in case some drbdsetup
> kills us
>


Lars,

One last DRBD related question before your get on the plain.
Does this fix this "deadlock in WFConnection state", which was
discussed on the list ? 

 I want to release 0.7.6 soon, and it would be nice to know
 for the changelog.

-Philipp
-- 
: Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner                      Tel +43-1-8178292-50 :
: LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH          Fax +43-1-8178292-82 :
: Schönbrunnerstr 244, 1120 Vienna, Austria    http://www.linbit.com :

Re: [Drbd-dev] Re: [DRBD-cvs] r1611 - branches/drbd-0.7/drbd

[Lars Ellenberg]

/ 2004-11-08 13:38:09 +0100
\ Philipp Reisner:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 13:20, svn@svn.drbd.org wrote:
> > Author: lars
> > Date: 2004-10-24 13:20:13 +0200 (Sun, 24 Oct 2004)
> > New Revision: 1611
> >
> > Modified:
> >    branches/drbd-0.7/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
> > Log:
> > * wake_up_interruptible did not wake up threads in wait_even(cstate)
> > * down_interruptible in drbd_send_handshake, just in case some drbdsetup
> > kills us
> >
> 
> 
> Lars,
> 
> One last DRBD related question before your get on the plain.
> Does this fix this "deadlock in WFConnection state", which was
> discussed on the list ? 

I have no idea.  it was a "just in case" fix. got no feedback on it, and
could not reproduce myself.

	lge