* [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command
@ 2016-07-06 7:58 Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
2016-07-08 11:26 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan @ 2016-07-06 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com'
https://github.com/qermit/drbd-utils
---
scripts/drbd.ocf | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/drbd.ocf b/scripts/drbd.ocf
index eee8d62..3995a24 100755
--- a/scripts/drbd.ocf
+++ b/scripts/drbd.ocf
@@ -359,13 +359,19 @@ drbd_set_status_variables() {
DRBD_DSTATE_LOCAL=()
DRBD_DSTATE_REMOTE=()
- if $DRBD_HAS_MULTI_VOLUME ; then
- out="$($DRBDSETUP sh-status "$DRBD_RESOURCE")" && eval "$out"
- else
- # without "MULTI_VOLUME", the DRBD_DEVICES array
- # should contain exactly one value
- out="$($DRBDSETUP "$DRBD_DEVICES" sh-status)" && eval "$out"
- fi
+ while : ; do
+ read -r tmp_resource tmp_nodeid tmp_role tmp_suspended
+ DRBD_ROLE_LOCAL[0]=${tmp_role#role:}
+ read -r tmp_volume tmp_minor tmp_dstate tmp_blocked
+ DRBD_DSTATE_LOCAL[0]=${tmp_dstate#disk:}
+ read -r tmp_remotenode tmp_remotenodeid tmp_remoteconnected tmp_remoterole tmp_remotecongested
+ DRBD_CSTATE[0]=${tmp_remoteconnected#connection:}
+ DRBD_ROLE_REMOTE[0]=${tmp_remoterole#role:}
+ read -r tmp_remotevolume tmp_replication tmp_remotedstate tmp_resync
+ DRBD_DSTATE_REMOTE[0]=${tmp_remotedstate#peer-disk:}
+ break
+ done < <($DRBDSETUP status $DRBD_RESOURCE --verbose)
+
# if there was no output at all, or a weird output
# make sure the status arrays won't be empty.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command
2016-07-06 7:58 [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
@ 2016-07-08 11:26 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
2016-07-11 16:27 ` Lars Ellenberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan @ 2016-07-08 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com'
I've found mistake in drbd.ocf in line 1045 anyway.
Kernel module version should be checked in opposite order.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
> Sent: 6 lipca 2016 09:59
> To: 'drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com'
> Subject: [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command
>
> https://github.com/qermit/drbd-utils
>
> ---
> scripts/drbd.ocf | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/drbd.ocf b/scripts/drbd.ocf
> index eee8d62..3995a24 100755
> --- a/scripts/drbd.ocf
> +++ b/scripts/drbd.ocf
> @@ -359,13 +359,19 @@ drbd_set_status_variables() {
> DRBD_DSTATE_LOCAL=()
> DRBD_DSTATE_REMOTE=()
>
> - if $DRBD_HAS_MULTI_VOLUME ; then
> - out="$($DRBDSETUP sh-status "$DRBD_RESOURCE")" && eval
> "$out"
> - else
> - # without "MULTI_VOLUME", the DRBD_DEVICES array
> - # should contain exactly one value
> - out="$($DRBDSETUP "$DRBD_DEVICES" sh-status)" && eval
> "$out"
> - fi
> + while : ; do
> + read -r tmp_resource tmp_nodeid tmp_role tmp_suspended
> + DRBD_ROLE_LOCAL[0]=${tmp_role#role:}
> + read -r tmp_volume tmp_minor tmp_dstate tmp_blocked
> + DRBD_DSTATE_LOCAL[0]=${tmp_dstate#disk:}
> + read -r tmp_remotenode tmp_remotenodeid
> tmp_remoteconnected tmp_remoterole tmp_remotecongested
> + DRBD_CSTATE[0]=${tmp_remoteconnected#connection:}
> + DRBD_ROLE_REMOTE[0]=${tmp_remoterole#role:}
> + read -r tmp_remotevolume tmp_replication
> tmp_remotedstate tmp_resync
> + DRBD_DSTATE_REMOTE[0]=${tmp_remotedstate#peer-disk:}
> + break
> + done < <($DRBDSETUP status $DRBD_RESOURCE --verbose)
> +
>
> # if there was no output at all, or a weird output
> # make sure the status arrays won't be empty.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command
2016-07-08 11:26 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
@ 2016-07-11 16:27 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-12 8:53 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ellenberg @ 2016-07-11 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drbd-dev
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:26:52AM +0000, Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan wrote:
> I've found mistake in drbd.ocf in line 1045 anyway.
> Kernel module version should be checked in opposite order.
That's not the only thing missing wrt drbd 9 and pacemaker integration.
I have some unfinished work around, which eventually will find its way
into the repositories and packages "soon".
But for now, it's unfinished :-|
--
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
: DRBD -- Heartbeat -- Corosync -- Pacemaker
: R&D, Integration, Ops, Consulting, Support
DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command
2016-07-11 16:27 ` Lars Ellenberg
@ 2016-07-12 8:53 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan @ 2016-07-12 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Lars Ellenberg', drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
I realized that so I've written new script (https://github.com/qermit/drbd-utils/blob/master/scripts/drbd9.ocf) based on stateful OCF example, Filesystem and drbd.ocf
The main difference to an original drbd.ocf is:
- it should not fail (or become unmanaged) when it's defined as a normal resource.
- each resource has its own debug level and debug file
- does not relay on drbdsetup sh-status
- creates .enable.${resourcename} file to cope with drbdmanage
- allows to have more than 2 clones
I find drbdmanage very nice tool but it causes some problems with pcs start/stop actions. It would be nice to have something like promotion type parameter (auto/manual/disabled).
Regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: drbd-dev-bounces@lists.linbit.com [mailto:drbd-dev-
> bounces@lists.linbit.com] On Behalf Of Lars Ellenberg
> Sent: 11 lipca 2016 18:28
> To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
> Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status
> command
>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:26:52AM +0000, Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan wrote:
> > I've found mistake in drbd.ocf in line 1045 anyway.
> > Kernel module version should be checked in opposite order.
>
> That's not the only thing missing wrt drbd 9 and pacemaker integration.
>
> I have some unfinished work around, which eventually will find its way
> into the repositories and packages "soon".
>
> But for now, it's unfinished :-|
>
> --
> : Lars Ellenberg
> : LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
> : DRBD -- Heartbeat -- Corosync -- Pacemaker
> : R&D, Integration, Ops, Consulting, Support
>
> DRBD(r) and LINBIT(r) are registered trademarks of LINBIT
> _______________________________________________
> drbd-dev mailing list
> drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-12 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-06 7:58 [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd.ocf: drbdsetup v9 has no sh-status command Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
2016-07-08 11:26 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
2016-07-11 16:27 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-12 8:53 ` Miedzik, Piotr Bogdan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox