Re: [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review

Re: [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review

[Andrew Lutomirski]

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release.
>>> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
>>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>>
>> Can you add ab838338a2a9e0cb8346eb0cab9977be13e8dce5?  (Somehow the cc:
>> stable got eaten, but 2.6.36 definitely needs this one.  2.6.35 probably
>> does as well but I haven't tested it.)
>
> Please get an ack from the maintainer of that driver and the drm
> maintainer so that I can apply it to the next .36 queue.
>

Can you ack this for 2.6.36, please?

I suspect that 2.6.35 needs it as well, but I won't be able to test on
my NV50 machine for two weeks (I'll be out of town, and I don't have
fancy enough remote control over that box to boot suspected-bad
kernels remotely).

--Andy

Re: [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review

[Ben Skeggs]

On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:15 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Greg KH wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release.
> >>> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> >>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >>
> >> Can you add ab838338a2a9e0cb8346eb0cab9977be13e8dce5?  (Somehow the cc:
> >> stable got eaten, but 2.6.36 definitely needs this one.  2.6.35 probably
> >> does as well but I haven't tested it.)
> >
> > Please get an ack from the maintainer of that driver and the drm
> > maintainer so that I can apply it to the next .36 queue.
Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

> >
> 
> Can you ack this for 2.6.36, please?
> 
> I suspect that 2.6.35 needs it as well, but I won't be able to test on
> my NV50 machine for two weeks (I'll be out of town, and I don't have
> fancy enough remote control over that box to boot suspected-bad
> kernels remotely).
> 
> --Andy

Re: [stable] [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:17:20PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:15 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >> Greg KH wrote:
> > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release.
> > >>> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >>> let us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > >>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> > >>
> > >> Can you add ab838338a2a9e0cb8346eb0cab9977be13e8dce5?  (Somehow the cc:
> > >> stable got eaten, but 2.6.36 definitely needs this one.  2.6.35 probably
> > >> does as well but I haven't tested it.)
> > >
> > > Please get an ack from the maintainer of that driver and the drm
> > > maintainer so that I can apply it to the next .36 queue.
> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Now applied, thanks.

greg k-h