dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm: Use kcalloc instead of kzalloc to allocate array
@ 2011-11-29 21:08 Thomas Meyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas Meyer @ 2011-11-29 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: airlied, dri-devel, linux-kernel

The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.

The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107

Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
---

diff -u -p a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c 2011-11-13 11:07:23.536775743 +0100
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c 2011-11-28 19:50:05.523467782 +0100
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ int drm_addbufs_agp(struct drm_device *
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	entry->buflist = kzalloc(count * sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
+	entry->buflist = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry->buflist) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		atomic_dec(&dev->buf_alloc);
@@ -831,14 +831,14 @@ int drm_addbufs_pci(struct drm_device *
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	entry->buflist = kzalloc(count * sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
+	entry->buflist = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry->buflist) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		atomic_dec(&dev->buf_alloc);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	entry->seglist = kzalloc(count * sizeof(*entry->seglist), GFP_KERNEL);
+	entry->seglist = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*entry->seglist), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry->seglist) {
 		kfree(entry->buflist);
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
@@ -1044,8 +1044,7 @@ static int drm_addbufs_sg(struct drm_dev
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	entry->buflist = kzalloc(count * sizeof(*entry->buflist),
-				GFP_KERNEL);
+	entry->buflist = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry->buflist) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		atomic_dec(&dev->buf_alloc);
@@ -1202,8 +1201,7 @@ static int drm_addbufs_fb(struct drm_dev
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	entry->buflist = kzalloc(count * sizeof(*entry->buflist),
-				GFP_KERNEL);
+	entry->buflist = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*entry->buflist), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry->buflist) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		atomic_dec(&dev->buf_alloc);
diff -u -p a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c 2011-11-28 19:36:47.383431617 +0100
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c 2011-11-28 19:50:03.813436083 +0100
@@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ int drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl(struct drm_de
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_err1;
 		}
-		clips = kzalloc(num_clips * sizeof(*clips), GFP_KERNEL);
+		clips = kcalloc(num_clips, sizeof(*clips), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!clips) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out_err1;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-11-29 21:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-29 21:08 [PATCH] drm: Use kcalloc instead of kzalloc to allocate array Thomas Meyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox