From: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Subject: [PATCH 16/26] drm/radeon: remove recursive mutex implementation
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335358003-2987-17-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335358003-2987-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 44 +-------------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 10 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 16 ++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c | 4 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 79a38da..43d0465 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -155,48 +155,6 @@ static inline int radeon_atrm_get_bios_chunk(uint8_t *bios, int offset, int len)
#endif
bool radeon_get_bios(struct radeon_device *rdev);
-
-/*
- * Mutex which allows recursive locking from the same process.
- */
-struct radeon_mutex {
- struct mutex mutex;
- struct task_struct *owner;
- int level;
-};
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_init(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
- mutex_init(&mutex->mutex);
- mutex->owner = NULL;
- mutex->level = 0;
-}
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_lock(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
- if (mutex_trylock(&mutex->mutex)) {
- /* The mutex was unlocked before, so it's ours now */
- mutex->owner = current;
- } else if (mutex->owner != current) {
- /* Another process locked the mutex, take it */
- mutex_lock(&mutex->mutex);
- mutex->owner = current;
- }
- /* Otherwise the mutex was already locked by this process */
-
- mutex->level++;
-}
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_unlock(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
- if (--mutex->level > 0)
- return;
-
- mutex->owner = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&mutex->mutex);
-}
-
-
/*
* Dummy page
*/
@@ -1506,7 +1464,7 @@ struct radeon_device {
struct radeon_gem gem;
struct radeon_pm pm;
uint32_t bios_scratch[RADEON_BIOS_NUM_SCRATCH];
- struct radeon_mutex cs_mutex;
+ struct mutex cs_mutex;
struct radeon_wb wb;
struct radeon_dummy_page dummy_page;
bool shutdown;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index 02eee4b..c3273b8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
@@ -512,9 +512,9 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
struct radeon_cs_parser parser;
int r;
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
if (!rdev->accel_working) {
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
return -EBUSY;
}
/* initialize parser */
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
DRM_ERROR("Failed to initialize parser !\n");
radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
return r;
}
r = radeon_cs_parser_relocs(&parser);
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
DRM_ERROR("Failed to parse relocation %d!\n", r);
radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
return r;
}
r = radeon_cs_ib_chunk(rdev, &parser);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
out:
radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
return r;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index 8a4a210..94f8561 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ int radeon_device_init(struct radeon_device *rdev,
/* mutex initialization are all done here so we
* can recall function without having locking issues */
- radeon_mutex_init(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&rdev->cs_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
mutex_init(&rdev->ring[i].mutex);
mutex_init(&rdev->dc_hw_i2c_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
index 220dbb8..b4a4982 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
@@ -356,13 +356,13 @@ int radeon_vm_manager_suspend(struct radeon_device *rdev)
{
struct radeon_vm *vm, *tmp;
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
/* unbind all active vm */
list_for_each_entry_safe(vm, tmp, &rdev->vm_manager.lru_vm, list) {
radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
}
rdev->vm_manager.funcs->fini(rdev);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
return radeon_sa_bo_manager_suspend(rdev, &rdev->vm_manager.sa_manager);
}
@@ -480,9 +480,9 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_add(struct radeon_device *rdev,
if (last_pfn > vm->last_pfn) {
/* grow va space 32M by 32M */
unsigned align = ((32 << 20) >> 12) - 1;
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
vm->last_pfn = (last_pfn + align) & ~align;
}
head = &vm->va;
@@ -598,9 +598,9 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_rmv(struct radeon_device *rdev,
return 0;
mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
radeon_vm_bo_update_pte(rdev, vm, bo, NULL);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
list_del(&bo_va->vm_list);
mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
list_del(&bo_va->bo_list);
@@ -645,9 +645,9 @@ void radeon_vm_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm)
mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
/* remove all bo */
r = radeon_bo_reserve(rdev->sa_manager.bo, false);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
index e15cb1f..bd4521e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
@@ -157,11 +157,11 @@ void radeon_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
static int radeon_gem_handle_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, int r)
{
if (r == -EDEADLK) {
- radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev);
if (!r)
r = -EAGAIN;
- radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
}
return r;
}
--
1.7.5.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 12:46 Reworking of GPU reset logic Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/26] drm/radeon: make radeon_gpu_is_lockup a per ring function Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/26] drm/radeon: replace gpu_lockup with ring->ready flag Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 03/26] drm/radeon: register ring debugfs handlers on init Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 04/26] drm/radeon: use central function for IB testing Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 05/26] drm/radeon: rework gpu lockup detection and processing Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 06/26] drm/radeon: fix a critical bug in the SA code Christian König
2012-04-25 13:19 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-25 13:36 ` Christian König
2012-04-25 13:40 ` Alex Deucher
2012-04-25 14:34 ` Jerome Glisse
2012-04-25 15:38 ` Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 07/26] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v2 Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 08/26] drm/radeon: add sub allocator debugfs file Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/26] drm/radeon: add biggest hole tracking and wakequeue to the sa v3 Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 10/26] drm/radeon: simplify semaphore handling Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2 Christian König
2012-04-25 12:56 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 12/26] drm/radeon: rename fence_wait_last to fence_wait_empty Christian König
2012-04-25 12:57 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 13/26] drm/radeon: rip out the ib pool Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 14/26] drm/radeon: fix a bug with the ring syncing code Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 15/26] drm/radeon: rework recursive gpu reset handling Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` Christian König [this message]
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 17/26] drm/radeon: move lockup detection code into radeon_ring.c Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 18/26] drm/radeon: make lockup timeout a module param Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 19/26] drm/radeon: unlock the ring mutex while waiting for the next fence Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 20/26] drm/radeon: make forcing ring activity a common function Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 21/26] drm/radeon: remove r300_gpu_is_lockup Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 22/26] drm/radeon: remove cayman_gpu_is_lockup Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 23/26] drm/radeon: add missing locking to fence debugfs function Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 24/26] drm/radeon: extend ring debugfs files with fence info Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 25/26] drm/radeon: keep the cs relocs inside the ib Christian König
2012-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 26/26] drm/radeon: add the ib content and relocs to the ring debugfs file Christian König
2012-04-25 14:36 ` Jerome Glisse
2012-04-25 15:47 ` Christian König
2012-04-25 16:15 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335358003-2987-17-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--to=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox