* [PATCH] drm/imx: lift 64x64 pixel minimum framebuffer size requirement
@ 2017-02-13 9:46 Philipp Zabel
2017-02-13 10:22 ` Lucas Stach
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Zabel @ 2017-02-13 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel; +Cc: kernel
There is no reason to limit framebuffer size to 64x64 pixels at a
minimum on creation. The actual scanout limitations (width >= 13 for the
base plane and height >= 2) are checked in atomic_check.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
index 33404295b447c..bef76cb0d05dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
@@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ static int imx_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
* this value would be used to check framebuffer size limitation
* at drm_mode_addfb().
*/
- drm->mode_config.min_width = 64;
- drm->mode_config.min_height = 64;
+ drm->mode_config.min_width = 1;
+ drm->mode_config.min_height = 1;
drm->mode_config.max_width = 4096;
drm->mode_config.max_height = 4096;
drm->mode_config.funcs = &imx_drm_mode_config_funcs;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/imx: lift 64x64 pixel minimum framebuffer size requirement
2017-02-13 9:46 [PATCH] drm/imx: lift 64x64 pixel minimum framebuffer size requirement Philipp Zabel
@ 2017-02-13 10:22 ` Lucas Stach
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Stach @ 2017-02-13 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philipp Zabel; +Cc: kernel, dri-devel
Am Montag, den 13.02.2017, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Philipp Zabel:
> There is no reason to limit framebuffer size to 64x64 pixels at a
> minimum on creation. The actual scanout limitations (width >= 13 for the
> base plane and height >= 2) are checked in atomic_check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> index 33404295b447c..bef76cb0d05dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ static int imx_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> * this value would be used to check framebuffer size limitation
> * at drm_mode_addfb().
> */
> - drm->mode_config.min_width = 64;
> - drm->mode_config.min_height = 64;
> + drm->mode_config.min_width = 1;
> + drm->mode_config.min_height = 1;
> drm->mode_config.max_width = 4096;
> drm->mode_config.max_height = 4096;
> drm->mode_config.funcs = &imx_drm_mode_config_funcs;
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-13 10:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-13 9:46 [PATCH] drm/imx: lift 64x64 pixel minimum framebuffer size requirement Philipp Zabel
2017-02-13 10:22 ` Lucas Stach
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox