From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm: add overlays as first class KMS objects
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:22:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425162216.529c126c@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yun39l5hqgt.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:16:18 -0700
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:12:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
> > Overlays are a bit like half-CRTCs. They have a location and fb, but
> > don't drive outputs directly. Add support for handling them to the core
> > KMS code.
>
> Are overlays/underlays not associated with a specific CRTC? To my mind,
> overlays are another scanout buffer associated with a specific CRTC, so
> you'd create a scanout buffer and attach that to a specific scanout slot
> in a crtc, with the 'default' slot being the usual graphics plane.
Yes, that matches my understanding as well. I've deliberately made the
implementation flexible there though, under the assumption that some
hardware allows a plane to be directed at more than one CRTC (though
probably not simultaneously).
Arguably, this is something we should have done when the
connector/encoder split was done (making planes in general first class
objects). But with today's code, treating a CRTC as a pixel pump and a
primary plane seems fine, with overlays tacked onto the side as
secondary pixel sources but tied to a specific CRTC.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-25 22:12 [RFC] drm: add overlays as first class KMS objects Jesse Barnes
2011-04-25 23:16 ` Keith Packard
2011-04-25 23:22 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2011-04-25 23:35 ` Stéphane Marchesin
2011-04-25 23:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-26 1:17 ` Keith Packard
2011-04-26 9:37 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-28 16:24 ` Rob Clark
2011-04-25 23:37 ` Keith Packard
2011-04-25 23:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-26 0:28 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-26 0:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-26 14:01 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-26 14:16 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-26 15:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-26 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-26 10:01 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-26 15:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-28 16:32 ` Rob Clark
2011-04-26 15:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2011-04-26 15:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-26 15:38 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-27 12:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-04-27 13:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-27 14:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-04-27 14:34 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-27 14:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-04-27 14:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2011-04-27 21:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-28 6:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-04-28 17:37 ` Jakob Bornecrantz
2011-04-28 17:03 ` Rob Clark
2011-04-28 17:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2011-05-13 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-05-14 1:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-05-15 0:00 ` Clark, Rob
2011-05-17 18:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425162216.529c126c@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).