* [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN
@ 2014-10-07 13:13 Chris Wilson
2014-10-07 19:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-10-08 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-10-07 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: dri-devel
The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for
events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what
is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
index ed7bc68f7e87..91e1105f2800 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
@@ -515,10 +515,12 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer,
size_t total;
ssize_t ret;
- ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
- !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0) {
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
+ !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
total = 0;
while (drm_dequeue_event(file_priv, total, count, &e)) {
@@ -532,7 +534,7 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer,
e->destroy(e);
}
- return total;
+ return total ?: -EAGAIN;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_read);
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN
2014-10-07 13:13 [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN Chris Wilson
@ 2014-10-07 19:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-10-08 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2014-10-07 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:13:51 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for
> events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab
> what is available and report an error if there was none.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> index ed7bc68f7e87..91e1105f2800 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> @@ -515,10 +515,12 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user
> *buffer, size_t total;
> ssize_t ret;
>
> - ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
> - !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0) {
> + ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
> + !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> total = 0;
> while (drm_dequeue_event(file_priv, total, count, &e)) {
> @@ -532,7 +534,7 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user
> *buffer, e->destroy(e);
> }
>
> - return total;
> + return total ?: -EAGAIN;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_read);
I'd prefer "total" to be spelled out after the ? (is this just a GNU
thing or does recent C implicitly use the first operand too?), but
that's no biggie. Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN
2014-10-07 13:13 [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN Chris Wilson
2014-10-07 19:33 ` Jesse Barnes
@ 2014-10-08 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-08 9:45 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-10-08 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for
> events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what
> is available and report an error if there was none.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN
2014-10-08 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2014-10-08 9:45 ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-08 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2014-10-08 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for
> > events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what
> > is available and report an error if there was none.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>
> Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip?
To the further dismay of anyone running kms_flip today,
Testcase: igt/kms_flip/nonblocing_read
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN
2014-10-08 9:45 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2014-10-08 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-10-08 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, dri-devel
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:45:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for
> > > events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what
> > > is available and report an error if there was none.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> >
> > Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip?
>
> To the further dismay of anyone running kms_flip today,
> Testcase: igt/kms_flip/nonblocing_read
Not if they upgrade to -nightly ;-) Thanks for the patch, merged to
topic/core-stuff.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-08 13:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-07 13:13 [PATCH] drm: Implement O_NONBLOCK support on /dev/dri/cardN Chris Wilson
2014-10-07 19:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-10-08 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-08 9:45 ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-08 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox