[PATCH 4.4 193/342] drm/nouveau/display: Enable vblank irqs after display engine is on again.

[PATCH 4.4 193/342] drm/nouveau/display: Enable vblank irqs after display engine is on again.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>

commit ff683df7bf34f90766a50c7e7454e219aef2710e upstream.

In the display resume path, move the calls to drm_vblank_on()
after the point when the display engine is running again.

Since changes were made to drm_update_vblank_count() in Linux 4.4+
to emulate hw vblank counters via vblank timestamping, the function
drm_vblank_on() now needs working high precision vblank timestamping
and therefore working scanout position queries at time of call.
These don't work before the display engine gets restarted, causing
miscalculation of vblank counter increments and thereby large forward
jumps in vblank count at display resume. These jumps can cause client
hangs on resume, or desktop hangs in the case of composited desktops.

Fix this Linux 4.4 regression by reordering calls accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
@@ -634,10 +634,6 @@ nouveau_display_resume(struct drm_device
 		nv_crtc->lut.depth = 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Make sure that drm and hw vblank irqs get resumed if needed. */
-	for (head = 0; head < dev->mode_config.num_crtc; head++)
-		drm_vblank_on(dev, head);
-
 	/* This should ensure we don't hit a locking problem when someone
 	 * wakes us up via a connector.  We should never go into suspend
 	 * while the display is on anyways.
@@ -647,6 +643,10 @@ nouveau_display_resume(struct drm_device
 
 	drm_helper_resume_force_mode(dev);
 
+	/* Make sure that drm and hw vblank irqs get resumed if needed. */
+	for (head = 0; head < dev->mode_config.num_crtc; head++)
+		drm_vblank_on(dev, head);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
 		struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(crtc);
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 4.4 232/342] drm: Fix treatment of drm_vblank_offdelay in drm_vblank_on() (v2)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>

commit bb74fc1bf3072bd3ab4ed5f43afd287a63baf2d7 upstream.

drm_vblank_offdelay can have three different types of values:

< 0 is to be always treated the same as dev->vblank_disable_immediate
= 0 is to be treated as "never disable vblanks"
> 0 is to be treated as disable immediate if kms driver wants it
    that way via dev->vblank_disable_immediate. Otherwise it is
    a disable timeout in msecs.

This got broken in Linux 3.18+ for the implementation of
drm_vblank_on. If the user specified a value of zero which should
always reenable vblank irqs in this function, a kms driver could
override the users choice by setting vblank_disable_immediate
to true. This patch fixes the regression and keeps the user in
control.

v2: Only reenable vblank if there are clients left or the user
    requested to "never disable vblanks" via offdelay 0. Enabling
    vblanks even in the "delayed disable" case (offdelay > 0) was
    specifically added by Ville in commit cd19e52aee922
    ("drm: Kick start vblank interrupts at drm_vblank_on()"),
    but after discussion it turns out that this was done by accident.

    Citing Ville: "I think it just ended up as a mess due to changing
    some of the semantics of offdelay<0 vs. offdelay==0 vs.
    disable_immediate during the review of the series. So yeah, given
    how drm_vblank_put() works now, I'd just make this check for
    offdelay==0."

Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: michel@daenzer.net
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -1494,8 +1494,7 @@ void drm_vblank_on(struct drm_device *de
 	 * re-enable interrupts if there are users left, or the
 	 * user wishes vblank interrupts to be enabled all the time.
 	 */
-	if (atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) != 0 ||
-	    (!dev->vblank_disable_immediate && drm_vblank_offdelay == 0))
+	if (atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) != 0 || drm_vblank_offdelay == 0)
 		WARN_ON(drm_vblank_enable(dev, pipe));
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
 }
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 4.4 230/342] drm: Prevent vblank counter bumps > 1 with active vblank clients. (v2)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>

commit 99b8e71597fadd6b2ac85e6e10f221f79dd9c1c1 upstream.

This fixes a regression introduced by the new drm_update_vblank_count()
implementation in Linux 4.4:

Restrict the bump of the software vblank counter in drm_update_vblank_count()
to a safe maximum value of +1 whenever there is the possibility that
concurrent readers of vblank timestamps could be active at the moment,
as the current implementation of the timestamp caching and updating is
not safe against concurrent readers for calls to store_vblank() with a
bump of anything but +1. A bump != 1 would very likely return corrupted
timestamps to userspace, because the same slot in the cache could
be concurrently written by store_vblank() and read by one of those
readers in a non-atomic fashion and without the read-retry logic
detecting this collision.

Concurrent readers can exist while drm_update_vblank_count() is called
from the drm_vblank_off() or drm_vblank_on() functions or other non-vblank-
irq callers. However, all those calls are happening with the vbl_lock
locked thereby preventing a drm_vblank_get(), so the vblank refcount
can't increase while drm_update_vblank_count() is executing. Therefore
a zero vblank refcount during execution of that function signals that
is safe for arbitrary counter bumps if called from outside vblank irq,
whereas a non-zero count is not safe.

Whenever the function is called from vblank irq, we have to assume concurrent
readers could show up any time during its execution, even if the refcount
is currently zero, as vblank irqs are usually only enabled due to the
presence of readers, and because when it is called from vblank irq it
can't hold the vbl_lock to protect it from sudden bumps in vblank refcount.
Therefore also restrict bumps to +1 when the function is called from vblank
irq.

Such bumps of more than +1 can happen at other times than reenabling
vblank irqs, e.g., when regular vblank interrupts get delayed by more
than 1 frame due to long held locks, long irq off periods, realtime
preemption on RT kernels, or system management interrupts.

A better solution would be to rewrite the timestamp caching to use
full seqlocks to allow concurrent writes and reads for arbitrary
vblank counter increments.

v2: Add code comment that this is essentially a hack and should
    be replaced by a full seqlock implementation for caching of
    timestamps.

Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Cc: michel@daenzer.net
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -221,6 +221,49 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(stru
 		diff = (flags & DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ) != 0;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIMXE: Need to replace this hack with proper seqlocks.
+	 *
+	 * Restrict the bump of the software vblank counter to a safe maximum
+	 * value of +1 whenever there is the possibility that concurrent readers
+	 * of vblank timestamps could be active at the moment, as the current
+	 * implementation of the timestamp caching and updating is not safe
+	 * against concurrent readers for calls to store_vblank() with a bump
+	 * of anything but +1. A bump != 1 would very likely return corrupted
+	 * timestamps to userspace, because the same slot in the cache could
+	 * be concurrently written by store_vblank() and read by one of those
+	 * readers without the read-retry logic detecting the collision.
+	 *
+	 * Concurrent readers can exist when we are called from the
+	 * drm_vblank_off() or drm_vblank_on() functions and other non-vblank-
+	 * irq callers. However, all those calls to us are happening with the
+	 * vbl_lock locked to prevent drm_vblank_get(), so the vblank refcount
+	 * can't increase while we are executing. Therefore a zero refcount at
+	 * this point is safe for arbitrary counter bumps if we are called
+	 * outside vblank irq, a non-zero count is not 100% safe. Unfortunately
+	 * we must also accept a refcount of 1, as whenever we are called from
+	 * drm_vblank_get() -> drm_vblank_enable() the refcount will be 1 and
+	 * we must let that one pass through in order to not lose vblank counts
+	 * during vblank irq off - which would completely defeat the whole
+	 * point of this routine.
+	 *
+	 * Whenever we are called from vblank irq, we have to assume concurrent
+	 * readers exist or can show up any time during our execution, even if
+	 * the refcount is currently zero, as vblank irqs are usually only
+	 * enabled due to the presence of readers, and because when we are called
+	 * from vblank irq we can't hold the vbl_lock to protect us from sudden
+	 * bumps in vblank refcount. Therefore also restrict bumps to +1 when
+	 * called from vblank irq.
+	 */
+	if ((diff > 1) && (atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) > 1 ||
+	    (flags & DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ))) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_VBL("clamping vblank bump to 1 on crtc %u: diffr=%u "
+			      "refcount %u, vblirq %u\n", pipe, diff,
+			      atomic_read(&vblank->refcount),
+			      (flags & DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ) != 0);
+		diff = 1;
+	}
+
 	DRM_DEBUG_VBL("updating vblank count on crtc %u:"
 		      " current=%u, diff=%u, hw=%u hw_last=%u\n",
 		      pipe, vblank->count, diff, cur_vblank, vblank->last);

[PATCH 4.4 231/342] drm: Fix drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset regression from Linux 4.4

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>

commit c61934ed9a0e3911a9935df26858726a7ec35ec0 upstream.

Changes to drm_update_vblank_count() in Linux 4.4 broke the
behaviour of the pre/post modeset functions as the new update
code doesn't deal with hw vblank counter resets inbetween calls
to drm_vblank_pre_modeset an drm_vblank_post_modeset, as it
should.

This causes mistreatment of such hw counter resets as counter
wraparound, and thereby large forward jumps of the software
vblank counter which in turn cause vblank event dispatching
and vblank waits to fail/hang --> userspace clients hang.

This symptom was reported on radeon-kms to cause a infinite
hang of KDE Plasma 5 shell's login procedure, preventing users
from logging in.

Fix this by detecting when drm_update_vblank_count() is called
inside a pre->post modeset interval. If so, clamp valid vblank
increments to the safe values 0 and 1, pretty much restoring
the update behavior of the old update code of Linux 4.3 and
earlier. Also reset the last recorded hw vblank count at call
to drm_vblank_post_modeset() to be safe against hw that after
modesetting, dpms on etc. only fires its first vblank irq after
drm_vblank_post_modeset() was already called.

Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Tested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: michel@daenzer.net
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -222,6 +222,21 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(stru
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * Within a drm_vblank_pre_modeset - drm_vblank_post_modeset
+	 * interval? If so then vblank irqs keep running and it will likely
+	 * happen that the hardware vblank counter is not trustworthy as it
+	 * might reset at some point in that interval and vblank timestamps
+	 * are not trustworthy either in that interval. Iow. this can result
+	 * in a bogus diff >> 1 which must be avoided as it would cause
+	 * random large forward jumps of the software vblank counter.
+	 */
+	if (diff > 1 && (vblank->inmodeset & 0x2)) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_VBL("clamping vblank bump to 1 on crtc %u: diffr=%u"
+			      " due to pre-modeset.\n", pipe, diff);
+		diff = 1;
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * FIMXE: Need to replace this hack with proper seqlocks.
 	 *
 	 * Restrict the bump of the software vblank counter to a safe maximum
@@ -1575,6 +1590,7 @@ void drm_vblank_post_modeset(struct drm_
 	if (vblank->inmodeset) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
 		dev->vblank_disable_allowed = true;
+		drm_reset_vblank_timestamp(dev, pipe);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
 
 		if (vblank->inmodeset & 0x2)