From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: daniel.vetter@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/fb-helper: reject any changes to the fbdev
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:12:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012161211.GB4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a664281f0fdf4950d542e080cd57c5a@agner.ch>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:55:45AM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-10-12 03:42, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 04:15:04PM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> The current fbdev emulation does not allow to push back changes in
> >> width, height or depth to KMS, hence reject any changes with an
> >> error. This makes sure that fbdev ioctl's fail properly and user
> >> space does not assume that changes succeeded.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> >> ---
> >> This rejects reconfiguration of framebuffer like
> >> fbset -rgba 5,6,5 -depth 16 (when in 24 bit mode by default)
> >> fbset -xres 123
> >>
> >> I think all users of drm_fb_helper_check_var use also the generic
> >> drm_fb_helper_set_par (or do otherwise not support changing size/
> >> depth). Hence, afaict, the change should be the right thing to do
> >> for all driver...
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> >> index 03414bd..596c056 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> >> @@ -1211,11 +1211,14 @@ int drm_fb_helper_check_var(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
> >> if (var->pixclock != 0 || in_dbg_master())
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> - /* Need to resize the fb object !!! */
> >> - if (var->bits_per_pixel > fb->bits_per_pixel ||
> >> - var->xres > fb->width || var->yres > fb->height ||
> >> - var->xres_virtual > fb->width || var->yres_virtual > fb->height) {
> >> - DRM_DEBUG("fb userspace requested width/height/bpp is greater than current fb "
> >> + /*
> >> + * Changes struct fb_var_screeninfo are currently not pushed back
> >> + * to KMS, hence fail if different settings are requested.
> >> + */
> >> + if (var->bits_per_pixel != fb->bits_per_pixel ||
> >> + var->xres != fb->width || var->yres != fb->height ||
> >> + var->xres_virtual != fb->width || var->yres_virtual != fb->height) {
> >
> > This still looks somewhat incomplete. Sounds like we should just
> > reject changes to everything except xoffset/yoffset.
> >
>
> What other parameters would you check? struct fb_var_screeninfo also has
> timings, but that is not something which is handy right here...
We should check the timings I think since we don't allow chaning them.
Though I suppose we don't even populate them. But then the user
shouldn't be allowed try to set them either I guess.
>
> One parameter we could check too is the depth calculated from the bit
> information, e.g.
>
>
> switch (var->bits_per_pixel) {
> case 16:
> depth = (var->green.length == 6) ? 16 : 15;
> break;
> case 32:
> depth = (var->transp.length > 0) ? 32 : 24;
> break;
> default:
> depth = var->bits_per_pixel;
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (depth != fb->depth) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("fb userspace requested depth different than current fb "
> + "request %d vs. %dx\n", depth, fb->depth);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> Or, maybe better, we could use drm_mode_legacy_fb_format to convert
> bpp/depth to fourcc and check that against the pixel_format field...
Also the red/green/... definitions for the actual bits of the color
channels. .grayscale is there well, and some colorspace thing which
I don't even know what it does. And rotation...
So I think in the end it pretty much boils down to everything except
xoffset/yoffset ;)
>
> --
> Stefan
>
>
> >> + DRM_DEBUG("fb userspace requested width/height/bpp different than current fb "
> >> "request %dx%d-%d (virtual %dx%d) > %dx%d-%d\n",
> >> var->xres, var->yres, var->bits_per_pixel,
> >> var->xres_virtual, var->yres_virtual,
> >> --
> >> 2.10.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dri-devel mailing list
> >> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-11 23:15 [RFC] drm/fb-helper: reject any changes to the fbdev Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 7:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-12 9:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2016-10-17 14:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-12 10:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-12 15:55 ` Stefan Agner
2016-10-12 16:12 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-10-12 17:05 ` Stefan Agner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161012161211.GB4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox