From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: move check for min/max width/height for atomic drivers
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161103141249.GT4617@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478096864-14639-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:27:44AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> drm-hwc + android tries to create an fb for the wallpaper layer, which
> is larger than the screen resolution, and potentially larger than
> mode_config->max_{width,height}. But the plane src_w/src_h is within
> the max limits, so it is something the hardware can otherwise do.
>
> For atomic drivers, defer the check to drm_atomic_plane_check().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 34edd4f..fb0f07ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -846,7 +846,9 @@ plane_switching_crtc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> static int drm_atomic_plane_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct drm_plane_state *state)
> {
> + struct drm_mode_config *config = &plane->dev->mode_config;
> unsigned int fb_width, fb_height;
> + unsigned int min_width, max_width, min_height, max_height;
> int ret;
>
> /* either *both* CRTC and FB must be set, or neither */
> @@ -909,6 +911,21 @@ static int drm_atomic_plane_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
>
> + min_width = config->min_width << 16;
> + max_width = config->max_width << 16;
> + min_height = config->min_height << 16;
> + max_height = config->max_height << 16;
> +
> + /* Make sure source dimensions are within bounds. */
> + if (min_width > state->src_w || state->src_w > max_width ||
> + min_height > state->src_h || state->src_h > max_height) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("Invalid source size "
> + "%u.%06ux%u.%06u\n",
> + state->src_w >> 16, ((state->src_w & 0xffff) * 15625) >> 10,
> + state->src_h >> 16, ((state->src_h & 0xffff) * 15625) >> 10);
> + return -ERANGE;
> + }
> +
> if (plane_switching_crtc(state->state, plane, state)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[PLANE:%d:%s] switching CRTC directly\n",
> plane->base.id, plane->name);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index b4b973f..7294bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -3369,15 +3369,23 @@ internal_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - if ((config->min_width > r->width) || (r->width > config->max_width)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer width %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> - r->width, config->min_width, config->max_width);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - }
> - if ((config->min_height > r->height) || (r->height > config->max_height)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer height %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> - r->height, config->min_height, config->max_height);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + /* for atomic drivers, we check the src dimensions in
> + * drm_atomic_plane_check().. allow creation of a fb
> + * that is larger than what can be scanned out, as
> + * long as userspace doesn't try to scanout a portion
> + * of the fb that is too large.
> + */
> + if (!file_priv->atomic) {
> + if ((config->min_width > r->width) || (r->width > config->max_width)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer width %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> + r->width, config->min_width, config->max_width);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> + if ((config->min_height > r->height) || (r->height > config->max_height)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer height %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> + r->height, config->min_height, config->max_height);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
So why not just bump max_foo in your driver?
Removing the restriction from the core seems likely to break some
drivers as they would now have to check the fb dimensions themselves.
> }
>
> if (r->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS &&
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 14:27 [PATCH] drm: move check for min/max width/height for atomic drivers Rob Clark
2016-11-03 13:58 ` Rob Clark
2016-11-03 14:12 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-11-03 14:14 ` Rob Clark
2016-11-03 14:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 15:22 ` Rob Clark
2016-11-03 15:35 ` Sean Paul
2016-11-03 18:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 18:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 18:37 ` Rob Clark
2016-11-03 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-08 9:53 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161103141249.GT4617@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox