dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:25:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113172555.GW23790@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYY_W8_L4---iMORt6vriUa9wKEi0d_kiMRbB_NQatRog@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can
> > > provide an ACK.
> >
> > Ack.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the
> > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO
> > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff
> > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.)
> >
> > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review.
> 
> Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent
> to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose.
> 
> > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here?
> 
> No issue.
> 
> What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an
> immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would
> have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine.

For next time around, just ping one of the drm-misc (or drm maintainers)
for an ack to merge it through a different tree. Or ask them what they
want to do. committer model isn't 100% free-wheeling, for cross-tree stuff
you still have maintainers who're supposed to do their jobs :-)

But by default everyone will assume you'll just commit, so you need to
poke them explicitly (like you've done here).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:25:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113172555.GW23790@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191113172555.36OFBkj1FmD1kdk3Mv7rtERC0dmA-i_5L6Q-eeU86l8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYY_W8_L4---iMORt6vriUa9wKEi0d_kiMRbB_NQatRog@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can
> > > provide an ACK.
> >
> > Ack.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the
> > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO
> > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff
> > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.)
> >
> > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review.
> 
> Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent
> to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose.
> 
> > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here?
> 
> No issue.
> 
> What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an
> immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would
> have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine.

For next time around, just ping one of the drm-misc (or drm maintainers)
for an ack to merge it through a different tree. Or ask them what they
want to do. committer model isn't 100% free-wheeling, for cross-tree stuff
you still have maintainers who're supposed to do their jobs :-)

But by default everyone will assume you'll just commit, so you need to
poke them explicitly (like you've done here).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-13 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 18:43 [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-14 20:59 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-15  3:58 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-05  0:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-11-05  0:40   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-11-05 15:29   ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-05 15:41     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-05 19:53       ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-11-05 19:53         ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-11-06  9:51         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-13 13:52       ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 17:25         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-11-13 17:25           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-13 13:49 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191113172555.GW23790@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox