From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/rect: Keep the scaled clip bounded
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:48:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191126144807.GZ29965@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122175623.13565-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:56:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Limit the scaled clip to only clip at most dst_w/h pixels.
> This avoids the problem with clip_scaled() not being able
> to return negative values. Since new_src_w/h is now properly
> bounded we can remove the clamp()s.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Testcase: igt/kms_selftest/drm_rect_clip_scaled_signed_vs_unsigned
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> index 818738e83d06..a9c7f90836f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static u32 clip_scaled(u32 src, u32 dst, u32 clip)
> if (dst == 0)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Only clip what we have. Keeps the result bounded. */
> + clip = min(clip, dst);
> +
> tmp = mul_u32_u32(src, dst - clip);
>
> /*
> @@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
btw I just noticed that the kerneldoc for drm_rect_clip_scaled() wasn't
updated after Maarten's patch :-/ It still talks about hscale and vscale.
I'm going to type a patch to fix that.
On your patch here: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
>
> - src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
> dst->x1 = clip->x1;
> }
> diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;
> @@ -102,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
>
> - src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
> dst->y1 = clip->y1;
> }
> diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;
> @@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
>
> - src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
> dst->x2 = clip->x2;
> }
> diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;
> @@ -118,7 +121,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
>
> - src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
> dst->y2 = clip->y2;
> }
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/rect: Keep the scaled clip bounded
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:48:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191126144807.GZ29965@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191126144807.sjf_KiB_zBHWbBLwIZCYECqXCxoz5Si5RS7zoyTbTbQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122175623.13565-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:56:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Limit the scaled clip to only clip at most dst_w/h pixels.
> This avoids the problem with clip_scaled() not being able
> to return negative values. Since new_src_w/h is now properly
> bounded we can remove the clamp()s.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Testcase: igt/kms_selftest/drm_rect_clip_scaled_signed_vs_unsigned
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> index 818738e83d06..a9c7f90836f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static u32 clip_scaled(u32 src, u32 dst, u32 clip)
> if (dst == 0)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Only clip what we have. Keeps the result bounded. */
> + clip = min(clip, dst);
> +
> tmp = mul_u32_u32(src, dst - clip);
>
> /*
> @@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
btw I just noticed that the kerneldoc for drm_rect_clip_scaled() wasn't
updated after Maarten's patch :-/ It still talks about hscale and vscale.
I'm going to type a patch to fix that.
On your patch here: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
>
> - src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
> dst->x1 = clip->x1;
> }
> diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;
> @@ -102,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
>
> - src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
> dst->y1 = clip->y1;
> }
> diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;
> @@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
>
> - src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
> dst->x2 = clip->x2;
> }
> diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;
> @@ -118,7 +121,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
>
> - src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> + src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
> dst->y2 = clip->y2;
> }
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-26 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 17:56 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/rect: Bugfixes and selftests Ville Syrjala
2019-11-22 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/rect: Avoid division by zero Ville Syrjala
2019-11-22 17:56 ` Ville Syrjala
2019-11-26 14:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-26 14:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/rect: Keep the scaled clip bounded Ville Syrjala
2019-11-26 14:48 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-11-26 14:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/rect: Keep the clipped dst rectangle in place Ville Syrjala
2019-11-22 17:56 ` Ville Syrjala
2019-11-26 15:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/selftests: Add drm_rect selftests Ville Syrjala
2019-11-22 17:56 ` Ville Syrjala
2019-11-26 15:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-26 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-27 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/rect: Bugfixes and selftests Benjamin GAIGNARD
2019-11-27 10:19 ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191126144807.GZ29965@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox