* [radeon-alex:amd-staging-drm-next 443/482] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c:39:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'kfd_initialized' was not declared. Should it be
@ 2020-09-23 2:28 kernel test robot
2020-09-23 2:28 ` [RFC PATCH radeon-alex] drm/amdgpu: kfd_initialized can be static kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-09-23 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix Kuehling; +Cc: kbuild-all, Kent Russell, dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
tree: git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux.git amd-staging-drm-next
head: 6fe4a372821db85834f5522d94d25139ff17e414
commit: 0b54e1e30e9f201a63922344917e11ab60da0d1b [443/482] drm/amdgpu: Fix handling of KFD initialization failures
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20200920 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.2-201-g24bdaac6-dirty
git checkout 0b54e1e30e9f201a63922344917e11ab60da0d1b
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c:39:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'kfd_initialized' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 39734 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH radeon-alex] drm/amdgpu: kfd_initialized can be static
2020-09-23 2:28 [radeon-alex:amd-staging-drm-next 443/482] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c:39:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'kfd_initialized' was not declared. Should it be kernel test robot
@ 2020-09-23 2:28 ` kernel test robot
2020-10-08 22:21 ` Felix Kuehling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-09-23 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix Kuehling; +Cc: kbuild-all, Kent Russell, dri-devel
Fixes: 0b54e1e30e9f ("drm/amdgpu: Fix handling of KFD initialization failures")
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
amdgpu_amdkfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
index 7f14461f7f402..01780bb8727f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
*/
uint64_t amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size;
-bool kfd_initialized;
+static bool kfd_initialized;
int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
{
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH radeon-alex] drm/amdgpu: kfd_initialized can be static
2020-09-23 2:28 ` [RFC PATCH radeon-alex] drm/amdgpu: kfd_initialized can be static kernel test robot
@ 2020-10-08 22:21 ` Felix Kuehling
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Felix Kuehling @ 2020-10-08 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amd-gfx list, Alex Deucher; +Cc: Kent Russell, dri-devel
FYI, I applied this patch to amd-staging-drm-next. Sorry for the delay,
I finally caught up with my vacation backlog.
Regards,
Felix
Am 2020-09-22 um 10:28 p.m. schrieb kernel test robot:
> Fixes: 0b54e1e30e9f ("drm/amdgpu: Fix handling of KFD initialization failures")
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
> amdgpu_amdkfd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> index 7f14461f7f402..01780bb8727f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> */
> uint64_t amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size;
>
> -bool kfd_initialized;
> +static bool kfd_initialized;
>
> int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
> {
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-08 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-23 2:28 [radeon-alex:amd-staging-drm-next 443/482] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c:39:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'kfd_initialized' was not declared. Should it be kernel test robot
2020-09-23 2:28 ` [RFC PATCH radeon-alex] drm/amdgpu: kfd_initialized can be static kernel test robot
2020-10-08 22:21 ` Felix Kuehling
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox