* [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly [not found] <20210716074201.28291-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com> @ 2021-07-16 7:41 ` Wayne Lin 2021-07-16 7:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms() Wayne Lin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wayne Lin @ 2021-07-16 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, Wayne Lin [Why] When we receive CSN message to notify one port is disconnected, we will implicitly set its corresponding num_slots to 0. Later on, we will eventually call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to arrange down streams. In drm_dp_update_payload_part1(), we iterate over all proposed_vcpis[] to do the update. Not specific to a target sink only. For example, if we light up 2 monitors, Monitor_A and Monitor_B, and then we unplug Monitor_B. Later on, when we call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to try to update payload for Monitor_A, we'll also implicitly clean payload for Monitor_B at the same time. And finally, when we try to call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to clean payload for Monitor_B, we will do nothing at this time since payload for Monitor_B has been cleaned up previously. For StarTech 1to3 DP hub, it seems like if we didn't update DPCD payload ID table then polling for "ACT Handled"(BIT_1 of DPCD 002C0h) will fail and this polling will last for 3 seconds. Therefore, guess the best way is we don't set the proposed_vcpi[] diretly. Let user of these herlper functions to set the proposed_vcpi directly. [How] 1. Revert commit 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") 2. Tackle the issue in previous commit by skipping those trasient proposed VCPIs. These stale VCPIs shoulde be explicitly cleared by user later on. Changes since v1: * Change debug macro to use drm_dbg_kms() instead * Amend the commit message to add Fixed & Cc tags Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Fixes: 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616035501.3776-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 ++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 159014455fab..2495e2c014ac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, { struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = mstb->mgr; struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; - int old_ddps, old_input, ret, i; + int old_ddps, ret; u8 new_pdt; bool new_mcs; bool dowork = false, create_connector = false; @@ -2529,7 +2529,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, } old_ddps = port->ddps; - old_input = port->input; port->input = conn_stat->input_port; port->ldps = conn_stat->legacy_device_plug_status; port->ddps = conn_stat->displayport_device_plug_status; @@ -2552,28 +2551,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, dowork = false; } - if (!old_input && old_ddps != port->ddps && !port->ddps) { - for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) { - struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]; - struct drm_dp_mst_port *port_validated; - - if (!vcpi) - continue; - - port_validated = - container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi); - port_validated = - drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port_validated); - if (!port_validated) { - mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock); - vcpi->num_slots = 0; - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - } else { - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port_validated); - } - } - } - if (port->connector) drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock); else if (create_connector) @@ -3404,8 +3381,15 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated( mgr, port); if (!port) { - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - return -EINVAL; + if (vcpi->num_slots == payload->num_slots) { + cur_slots += vcpi->num_slots; + payload->start_slot = req_payload.start_slot; + continue; + } else { + drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set payload to invalid sink"); + mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } } put_port = true; } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms() [not found] <20210716074201.28291-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com> 2021-07-16 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly Wayne Lin @ 2021-07-16 7:42 ` Wayne Lin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wayne Lin @ 2021-07-16 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: dri-devel, José Roberto de Souza, Wayne Lin From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build. Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale topology") Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616194415.36926-1-jose.souza@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index bf6fa98b4ab7..a68dc25a19c6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -3383,7 +3383,9 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); if (skip) { - drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n", i); + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, + "Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n", + i); continue; } /* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing @@ -3398,7 +3400,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) payload->start_slot = req_payload.start_slot; continue; } else { - drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set payload to invalid sink"); + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, + "Fail:set payload to invalid sink"); mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); return -EINVAL; } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210716073831.27500-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>]
* [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly [not found] <20210716073831.27500-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com> @ 2021-07-16 7:38 ` Wayne Lin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wayne Lin @ 2021-07-16 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, Wayne Lin [Why] When we receive CSN message to notify one port is disconnected, we will implicitly set its corresponding num_slots to 0. Later on, we will eventually call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to arrange down streams. In drm_dp_update_payload_part1(), we iterate over all proposed_vcpis[] to do the update. Not specific to a target sink only. For example, if we light up 2 monitors, Monitor_A and Monitor_B, and then we unplug Monitor_B. Later on, when we call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to try to update payload for Monitor_A, we'll also implicitly clean payload for Monitor_B at the same time. And finally, when we try to call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to clean payload for Monitor_B, we will do nothing at this time since payload for Monitor_B has been cleaned up previously. For StarTech 1to3 DP hub, it seems like if we didn't update DPCD payload ID table then polling for "ACT Handled"(BIT_1 of DPCD 002C0h) will fail and this polling will last for 3 seconds. Therefore, guess the best way is we don't set the proposed_vcpi[] diretly. Let user of these herlper functions to set the proposed_vcpi directly. [How] 1. Revert commit 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") 2. Tackle the issue in previous commit by skipping those trasient proposed VCPIs. These stale VCPIs shoulde be explicitly cleared by user later on. Changes since v1: * Change debug macro to use drm_dbg_kms() instead * Amend the commit message to add Fixed & Cc tags Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Fixes: 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616035501.3776-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 ++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 9c75c8815056..41d790df81bb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -2499,7 +2499,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, { struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = mstb->mgr; struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; - int old_ddps, old_input, ret, i; + int old_ddps, ret; u8 new_pdt; bool new_mcs; bool dowork = false, create_connector = false; @@ -2531,7 +2531,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, } old_ddps = port->ddps; - old_input = port->input; port->input = conn_stat->input_port; port->ldps = conn_stat->legacy_device_plug_status; port->ddps = conn_stat->displayport_device_plug_status; @@ -2554,28 +2553,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, dowork = false; } - if (!old_input && old_ddps != port->ddps && !port->ddps) { - for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) { - struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]; - struct drm_dp_mst_port *port_validated; - - if (!vcpi) - continue; - - port_validated = - container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi); - port_validated = - drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port_validated); - if (!port_validated) { - mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock); - vcpi->num_slots = 0; - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - } else { - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port_validated); - } - } - } - if (port->connector) drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock); else if (create_connector) @@ -3406,8 +3383,15 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated( mgr, port); if (!port) { - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - return -EINVAL; + if (vcpi->num_slots == payload->num_slots) { + cur_slots += vcpi->num_slots; + payload->start_slot = req_payload.start_slot; + continue; + } else { + drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set payload to invalid sink"); + mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } } put_port = true; } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210716073450.26497-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>]
* [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly [not found] <20210716073450.26497-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com> @ 2021-07-16 7:34 ` Wayne Lin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wayne Lin @ 2021-07-16 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, Wayne Lin [Why] When we receive CSN message to notify one port is disconnected, we will implicitly set its corresponding num_slots to 0. Later on, we will eventually call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to arrange down streams. In drm_dp_update_payload_part1(), we iterate over all proposed_vcpis[] to do the update. Not specific to a target sink only. For example, if we light up 2 monitors, Monitor_A and Monitor_B, and then we unplug Monitor_B. Later on, when we call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to try to update payload for Monitor_A, we'll also implicitly clean payload for Monitor_B at the same time. And finally, when we try to call drm_dp_update_payload_part1() to clean payload for Monitor_B, we will do nothing at this time since payload for Monitor_B has been cleaned up previously. For StarTech 1to3 DP hub, it seems like if we didn't update DPCD payload ID table then polling for "ACT Handled"(BIT_1 of DPCD 002C0h) will fail and this polling will last for 3 seconds. Therefore, guess the best way is we don't set the proposed_vcpi[] diretly. Let user of these herlper functions to set the proposed_vcpi directly. [How] 1. Revert commit 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") 2. Tackle the issue in previous commit by skipping those trasient proposed VCPIs. These stale VCPIs shoulde be explicitly cleared by user later on. Changes since v1: * Change debug macro to use drm_dbg_kms() instead * Amend the commit message to add Fixed & Cc tags Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Fixes: 7617e9621bf2 ("drm/dp_mst: clear time slots for ports invalid") Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616035501.3776-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 ++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index a08cc6b53bc2..702aa0711f80 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -2499,7 +2499,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, { struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = mstb->mgr; struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; - int old_ddps, old_input, ret, i; + int old_ddps, ret; u8 new_pdt; bool new_mcs; bool dowork = false, create_connector = false; @@ -2531,7 +2531,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, } old_ddps = port->ddps; - old_input = port->input; port->input = conn_stat->input_port; port->ldps = conn_stat->legacy_device_plug_status; port->ddps = conn_stat->displayport_device_plug_status; @@ -2554,28 +2553,6 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, dowork = false; } - if (!old_input && old_ddps != port->ddps && !port->ddps) { - for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) { - struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]; - struct drm_dp_mst_port *port_validated; - - if (!vcpi) - continue; - - port_validated = - container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi); - port_validated = - drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port_validated); - if (!port_validated) { - mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock); - vcpi->num_slots = 0; - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - } else { - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port_validated); - } - } - } - if (port->connector) drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock); else if (create_connector) @@ -3406,8 +3383,15 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated( mgr, port); if (!port) { - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - return -EINVAL; + if (vcpi->num_slots == payload->num_slots) { + cur_slots += vcpi->num_slots; + payload->start_slot = req_payload.start_slot; + continue; + } else { + drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set payload to invalid sink"); + mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } } put_port = true; } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-16 7:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210716074201.28291-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
2021-07-16 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly Wayne Lin
2021-07-16 7:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms() Wayne Lin
[not found] <20210716073831.27500-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
2021-07-16 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly Wayne Lin
[not found] <20210716073450.26497-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
2021-07-16 7:34 ` Wayne Lin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox