From: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@disroot.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
"Tales Lelo da Aparecida" <tales.aparecida@gmail.com>,
"Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho" <gcarlos@disroot.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_init()
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:22:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703172228.11166-9-gcarlos@disroot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240703172228.11166-1-gcarlos@disroot.org>
Add three KUnit test cases for the drm_framebuffer_init function:
1. Test if expected values are being set after drm_framebuffer_init() call.
2. Try to init a framebuffer without setting its format.
3. Try calling drm_framebuffer_init() with mismatch of the drm_device passed
at the first argument and the one pointed by fb->dev.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@disroot.org>
---
v2:
- Reorder kunit cases alphabetically.
- Let fb1.dev unset instead of set it to wrong_drm to test mismatched
drm_device passed as drm_framebuffer_init() argument.
- Clean the framebuffer object.
v3:
- Split into three tests.
- Add documentation.
- Stop testing lookup here.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
index 54829e832c5e..73a1a3a3987e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
@@ -569,10 +569,78 @@ static void drm_test_framebuffer_lookup_inexistent(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, fb);
}
+/* Test if drm_framebuffer_init initializes the framebuffer with expected values */
+static void drm_test_framebuffer_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct drm_framebuffer_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ struct drm_device *dev = &priv->dev;
+ struct drm_format_info format = { };
+ struct drm_framebuffer fb1 = { .dev = dev, .format = &format };
+ struct drm_framebuffer_funcs funcs = { };
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &fb1, &funcs);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ /* Check if fb->funcs is actually set to the drm_framebuffer_funcs passed on */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, fb1.funcs, &funcs);
+
+ /* The fb->comm must be set to the current running process */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fb1.comm, current->comm);
+
+ /* The fb->base must be successfully initialized */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, fb1.base.id, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fb1.base.type, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_FB);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kref_read(&fb1.base.refcount), 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, fb1.base.free_cb, &drm_framebuffer_free);
+
+ /* There must be just that one fb initialized */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dev->mode_config.num_fb, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dev->mode_config.fb_list.prev, &fb1.head);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dev->mode_config.fb_list.next, &fb1.head);
+
+ drm_framebuffer_cleanup(&fb1);
+}
+
+/* Try to init a framebuffer without setting its format */
+static void drm_test_framebuffer_init_bad_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct drm_framebuffer_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ struct drm_device *dev = &priv->dev;
+ struct drm_framebuffer fb1 = { .dev = dev, .format = NULL };
+ struct drm_framebuffer_funcs funcs = { };
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Fails if fb.format isn't set */
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &fb1, &funcs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test calling drm_framebuffer_init() passing a framebuffer linked to a
+ * different drm_device parent from the one passed on the first argument.
+ */
+static void drm_test_framebuffer_init_dev_mismatch(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct drm_framebuffer_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ struct drm_device *dev = &priv->dev;
+ struct drm_format_info format = { };
+ struct drm_framebuffer fb1 = { .dev = NULL, .format = &format };
+ struct drm_framebuffer_funcs funcs = { };
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Fails if fb->dev doesn't point to the drm_device passed on first arg */
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &fb1, &funcs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case drm_framebuffer_tests[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_framebuffer_check_src_coords, check_src_coords_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_cleanup),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_framebuffer_create, drm_framebuffer_create_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_init),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_init_bad_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_init_dev_mismatch),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_lookup),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_lookup_inexistent),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_modifiers_not_supported),
--
2.44.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 17:22 [PATCH v3 0/9] Increase coverage on drm_framebuffer.c Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] drm/tests: Stop using deprecated dev_private member on drm_framebuffer tests Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:24 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] drm/tests: Add parameters to the drm_test_framebuffer_create test Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] drm/tests: Replace strcpy to strscpy on " Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/tests: Add test case for drm_internal_framebuffer_create() Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_check_src_coords() Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_cleanup() Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_lookup() Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-08 11:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho [this message]
2024-07-05 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_init() kernel test robot
2024-07-08 11:35 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-03 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_free() Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho
2024-07-05 11:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-08 11:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-07-08 16:41 ` Carlos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240703172228.11166-9-gcarlos@disroot.org \
--to=gcarlos@disroot.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arthurgrillo@riseup.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tales.aparecida@gmail.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox