* [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager
@ 2026-04-29 12:37 Tejas Upadhyay
2026-04-30 9:14 ` Matthew Auld
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejas Upadhyay @ 2026-04-29 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe
Cc: matthew.auld, Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam, dri-devel, amd-gfx,
Tejas Upadhyay
gpu_buddy APIs are expected to be called with the driver-provided lock
held, but there is no runtime enforcement of this contract. Add lockdep
annotations to catch locking violations early.
Introduce gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock() for the driver to register the
lock that protects the buddy manager. Add gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held()
assertions to all exported gpu_buddy and drm_buddy APIs that
access/modify the manager state. The lock_dep_map field is only compiled
in when CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled, adding zero overhead to production
builds.
Wire up xe_ttm_vram_mgr to register its mutex with the buddy manager
after initialization.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/buddy.c | 11 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c | 1 +
include/linux/gpu_buddy.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
index 52686672e99f..eb1457376307 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
@@ -437,6 +437,9 @@ int gpu_buddy_init(struct gpu_buddy *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
root_count++;
} while (size);
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ mm->lock_dep_map = NULL;
+#endif
return 0;
out_free_roots:
@@ -538,6 +541,7 @@ void gpu_buddy_reset_clear(struct gpu_buddy *mm, bool is_clear)
unsigned int order;
int i;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
size = mm->size;
for (i = 0; i < mm->n_roots; ++i) {
order = ilog2(size) - ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
@@ -580,6 +584,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpu_buddy_reset_clear);
void gpu_buddy_free_block(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
struct gpu_buddy_block *block)
{
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
BUG_ON(!gpu_buddy_block_is_allocated(block));
mm->avail += gpu_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
if (gpu_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
@@ -633,6 +638,7 @@ void gpu_buddy_free_list(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
{
bool mark_clear = flags & GPU_BUDDY_CLEARED;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
__gpu_buddy_free_list(mm, objects, mark_clear, !mark_clear);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpu_buddy_free_list);
@@ -1172,6 +1178,8 @@ int gpu_buddy_block_trim(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
u64 new_start;
int err;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
+
if (!list_is_singular(blocks))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1287,6 +1295,8 @@ int gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
unsigned long pages;
int err;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
+
if (size < mm->chunk_size)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1475,6 +1485,7 @@ void gpu_buddy_print(struct gpu_buddy *mm)
{
int order;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
pr_info("chunk_size: %lluKiB, total: %lluMiB, free: %lluMiB, clear_free: %lluMiB\n",
mm->chunk_size >> 10, mm->size >> 20, mm->avail >> 20, mm->clear_avail >> 20);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
index 841f3de5f307..faa025498de4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void drm_buddy_print(struct gpu_buddy *mm, struct drm_printer *p)
{
int order;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(mm);
drm_printf(p, "chunk_size: %lluKiB, total: %lluMiB, free: %lluMiB, clear_free: %lluMiB\n",
mm->chunk_size >> 10, mm->size >> 20, mm->avail >> 20, mm->clear_avail >> 20);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
index 5fd0d5506a7e..7ebc4d278c3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int __xe_ttm_vram_mgr_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr,
if (err)
return err;
+ gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock(&mgr->mm, &mgr->lock);
ttm_set_driver_manager(&xe->ttm, mem_type, &mgr->manager);
ttm_resource_manager_set_used(&mgr->manager, true);
diff --git a/include/linux/gpu_buddy.h b/include/linux/gpu_buddy.h
index 5fa917ba5450..71941a039648 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpu_buddy.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpu_buddy.h
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ struct gpu_buddy_block {
* @avail: Total free space currently available for allocation in bytes.
* @clear_avail: Free space available in the clear tree (zeroed memory) in bytes.
* This is a subset of @avail.
+ * @lock_dep_map: Annotates gpu_buddy API with a driver provided lock.
*/
struct gpu_buddy {
/* private: */
@@ -179,8 +180,48 @@ struct gpu_buddy {
u64 size;
u64 avail;
u64 clear_avail;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ struct lockdep_map *lock_dep_map;
+#endif
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+/**
+ * gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock() - Set the lock protecting accesses to GPU BUDDY
+ * @mm: Pointer to GPU buddy structure.
+ * @lock: the lock used to protect the gpu buddy. The locking primitive
+ * must contain a dep_map field.
+ *
+ * Call this to annotate gpu_buddy APIs which access/modify gpu_buddy manager
+ */
+#define gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock(mm, lock) \
+ do { \
+ struct gpu_buddy *__mm = (mm); \
+ if (!WARN(__mm->lock_dep_map, "GPU BUDDY MM lock should be set only once.")) \
+ __mm->lock_dep_map = &(lock)->dep_map; \
+ } while (0)
+#else
+#define gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock(mm, lock) do { (void)(mm); (void)(lock); } while (0)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+/**
+ * gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held() - Assert GPU BUDDY manager lock is held
+ * @mm: Pointer to the GPU BUDDY structure.
+ *
+ * Ensure driver lock is held.
+ */
+static inline void gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(struct gpu_buddy *mm)
+{
+ if (mm->lock_dep_map)
+ lockdep_assert(lock_is_held_type(mm->lock_dep_map, 0));
+}
+#else
+static inline void gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held(struct gpu_buddy *mm)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
static inline u64
gpu_buddy_block_offset(const struct gpu_buddy_block *block)
{
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager
2026-04-29 12:37 [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager Tejas Upadhyay
@ 2026-04-30 9:14 ` Matthew Auld
2026-04-30 9:34 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-04-30 13:12 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2026-04-30 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejas Upadhyay, intel-xe; +Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam, dri-devel, amd-gfx
On 29/04/2026 13:37, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> gpu_buddy APIs are expected to be called with the driver-provided lock
> held, but there is no runtime enforcement of this contract. Add lockdep
> annotations to catch locking violations early.
>
> Introduce gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock() for the driver to register the
> lock that protects the buddy manager. Add gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held()
> assertions to all exported gpu_buddy and drm_buddy APIs that
> access/modify the manager state. The lock_dep_map field is only compiled
> in when CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled, adding zero overhead to production
> builds.
>
> Wire up xe_ttm_vram_mgr to register its mutex with the buddy manager
> after initialization.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
I think add:
Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager
2026-04-30 9:14 ` Matthew Auld
@ 2026-04-30 9:34 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-04-30 13:12 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Upadhyay, Tejas @ 2026-04-30 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auld, Matthew, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auld, Matthew <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Sent: 30 April 2026 14:45
> To: Upadhyay, Tejas <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>; intel-
> xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu
> buddy manager
>
> On 29/04/2026 13:37, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> > gpu_buddy APIs are expected to be called with the driver-provided lock
> > held, but there is no runtime enforcement of this contract. Add
> > lockdep annotations to catch locking violations early.
> >
> > Introduce gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock() for the driver to register the
> > lock that protects the buddy manager. Add gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held()
> > assertions to all exported gpu_buddy and drm_buddy APIs that
> > access/modify the manager state. The lock_dep_map field is only
> > compiled in when CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled, adding zero overhead to
> > production builds.
> >
> > Wire up xe_ttm_vram_mgr to register its mutex with the buddy manager
> > after initialization.
> >
> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
>
> I think add:
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Sure thanks for review, will add.
Tejas
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager
2026-04-30 9:14 ` Matthew Auld
2026-04-30 9:34 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
@ 2026-04-30 13:12 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Upadhyay, Tejas @ 2026-04-30 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auld, Matthew, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Failures isn’t related to change https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/165720/#rev1. Will merge it later. Please let me know in case of any concerns.
Tejas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auld, Matthew <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Sent: 30 April 2026 14:45
> To: Upadhyay, Tejas <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>; intel-
> xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu
> buddy manager
>
> On 29/04/2026 13:37, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> > gpu_buddy APIs are expected to be called with the driver-provided lock
> > held, but there is no runtime enforcement of this contract. Add
> > lockdep annotations to catch locking violations early.
> >
> > Introduce gpu_buddy_driver_set_lock() for the driver to register the
> > lock that protects the buddy manager. Add gpu_buddy_driver_lock_held()
> > assertions to all exported gpu_buddy and drm_buddy APIs that
> > access/modify the manager state. The lock_dep_map field is only
> > compiled in when CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled, adding zero overhead to
> > production builds.
> >
> > Wire up xe_ttm_vram_mgr to register its mutex with the buddy manager
> > after initialization.
> >
> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
>
> I think add:
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-30 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-29 12:37 [PATCH] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager Tejas Upadhyay
2026-04-30 9:14 ` Matthew Auld
2026-04-30 9:34 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-04-30 13:12 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox