From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mikko Perttunen" <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] gpu: host1x: Wait for timeout worker completion on channel free
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:24:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609082417.C84081F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-b4-host1x-small-fixes-a-v1-1-7c1131c0b3ad@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing teardown of `cdma->update_work` during channel destruction causes workqueue corruption and use-after-free races.
- [High] Spurious timeout handler execution aborts newly-started jobs due to unsafe non-synchronous timer cancellation in `update_cdma_locked()`.
--
commit 716b1c0819a18e8bf5a813661ef56163eb1114aa
Author: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
gpu: host1x: Wait for timeout worker completion on channel free
This commit addresses a race condition during CDMA teardown. By replacing
cancel_delayed_work() with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), it ensures pending
timeout work completes before the CDMA channel is freed. This prevents the
timeout handler from waiting on a destroyed lock.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
> index 3f3f0018eee0d..ab714d221120c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int cdma_timeout_init(struct host1x_cdma *cdma)
> static void cdma_timeout_destroy(struct host1x_cdma *cdma)
> {
> if (cdma->timeout.initialized)
> - cancel_delayed_work(&cdma->timeout.wq);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&cdma->timeout.wq);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the missing teardown of
cdma->update_work during channel destruction cause workqueue corruption and
use-after-free races?
When release_channel() calls host1x_cdma_deinit(), it destroys the push
buffer but fails to call cancel_work_sync(&cdma->update_work):
drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c:host1x_cdma_deinit() {
...
host1x_pushbuffer_destroy(pb);
host1x_hw_cdma_timeout_destroy(host1x, cdma);
return 0;
}
The cdma->update_work can be scheduled asynchronously by a hardware syncpoint
interrupt. If the channel is immediately reallocated to a new client,
host1x_cdma_init() unconditionally executes INIT_WORK(&cdma->update_work, ...).
Calling INIT_WORK() on an actively queued or running work struct can corrupt
the workqueue linked lists. Additionally, if the stray cdma_update_work()
executes after the push buffer is destroyed, can it dereference a NULL
cdma->push_buffer.mapped?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does spurious timeout handler execution
abort newly-started jobs due to unsafe non-synchronous timer cancellation in
update_cdma_locked()?
When a job finishes, stop_cdma_timer_locked() uses non-sync
cancel_delayed_work() under a lock, leaving the executing handler to run:
drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c:stop_cdma_timer_locked() {
cancel_delayed_work(&cdma->timeout.wq);
cdma->timeout.client = NULL;
}
If the timeout handler cdma_timeout_handler() has already started on another
CPU, it blocks waiting for cdma->lock. The current thread then immediately
starts the next job, updating cdma->timeout.client and syncpt_val, and
releases the lock.
The stale timeout handler wakes up, sees cdma->timeout.client is not NULL,
and checks if the NEW job has completed. Since it hasn't, the handler
spuriously assumes a timeout occurred, freezes the CDMA channel, and aborts
the new job.
Is a generation sequence number or explicit time check against start_ktime in
the handler required to fix this race safely, since using
cancel_delayed_work_sync() here would cause a deadlock?
>
> cdma->timeout.initialized = false;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609-b4-host1x-small-fixes-a-v1-0-7c1131c0b3ad@nvidia.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 8:09 [PATCH 0/6] Miscellaneous fixes for the Host1x driver Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] gpu: host1x: Wait for timeout worker completion on channel free Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] gpu: host1x: Avoid double device_add when clients already present Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] gpu: host1x: Fix offset calculation in trace_write_gather Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] gpu: host1x: Avoid stack over-read in debug output helpers Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] gpu: host1x: Change pin_job() return type to int Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] gpu: host1x: Annotate intentional syncpoint wrap-around Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:52 ` [PATCH 0/6] Miscellaneous fixes for the Host1x driver Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609082417.C84081F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox