From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mikko Perttunen" <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpu: host1x: Fix offset calculation in trace_write_gather
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:26:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609082605.916DF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-b4-host1x-small-fixes-a-v1-3-7c1131c0b3ad@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Integer overflow in `copy_gathers` leads to a massive heap buffer overflow
- [High] Mismatched buffer object and offset in `trace_write_gather` causes out-of-bounds read and information leak
- [High] Trace event uses fixed-size scalar field for dynamic string, causing use-after-free
- [High] Missing error pointer check for `host1x_bo_mmap()` leads to kernel oops on failure
--
commit 32809268254f182a4349aa6566cab30f99b736b0
Author: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
gpu: host1x: Fix offset calculation in trace_write_gather
When a gather longer than 2*TRACE_MAX_LENGTH (256) words is traced
through host1x_cdma_push_gather, the reported BO offset drifts from
the third iteration onward.
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does copy_gathers() in
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c have an integer overflow when accumulating sizes?
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c:copy_gathers() {
...
size += g->words * sizeof(u32);
...
}
If userspace submits a job with enough commands, could size wrap around on
32-bit systems?
This wrapped size would then be used by dma_alloc_wc() to allocate a small
buffer, followed by a loop that copies a large amount of data:
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c:copy_gathers() {
...
memcpy(job->gather_copy_mapped + offset, gather + g->offset,
g->words * sizeof(u32));
...
}
Could this lead to a large heap buffer overflow?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at the trace event
definition for host1x_cdma_push_gather:
include/trace/events/host1x.h:
__field(const char *, name)
According to trace subsystem rules, dynamic-length strings should be stored
using __string() and __assign_str() to capture the string contents. By using
a pointer field, only the address is captured.
If the trace buffer is read after the device has been unregistered and its
name freed, could this pointer dangle and cause a use-after-free when
formatting the trace?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed host1x_bo_mmap() can return an
error pointer (e.g. ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) from tegra_bo_mmap()).
In trace_write_gather() earlier in this file:
if (host1x_debug_trace_cmdbuf)
mem = host1x_bo_mmap(bo);
if (mem) {
Is it possible for mem to be an error pointer here? If so, checking if (mem)
will treat the error pointer as a valid address.
There appear to be similar checks elsewhere that might not catch error
pointers:
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c:copy_gathers() {
...
gather = host1x_bo_mmap(g->bo);
memcpy(job->gather_copy_mapped + offset, gather + g->offset,
g->words * sizeof(u32));
...
}
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c:do_relocs() {
...
cmdbuf_addr = host1x_bo_mmap(cmdbuf);
if (unlikely(!cmdbuf_addr)) {
...
}
Could these lead to a kernel oops if host1x_bo_mmap() fails and returns an
error pointer instead of NULL?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
> index 2df6a16d484e0..9dda73199889c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -36,10 +36,9 @@ static void trace_write_gather(struct host1x_cdma *cdma, struct host1x_bo *bo,
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a mismatched buffer object and
offset passed to trace_write_gather()?
When the firewall is enabled, copy_gathers() combines all gathers into a
single DMA buffer and overwrites g->offset with the cumulative byte offset,
but leaves g->bo pointing to the original buffer:
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c:copy_gathers() {
...
g->base = job->gather_copy;
g->offset = offset;
...
}
Then submit_gathers() passes these to trace_write_gather():
drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c:submit_gathers() {
...
trace_write_gather(cdma, g->bo, g->offset, g->words);
...
}
Since trace_write_gather() maps the original BO but uses the new combined
offset:
> for (i = 0; i < words; i += TRACE_MAX_LENGTH) {
> u32 num_words = min(words - i, TRACE_MAX_LENGTH);
>
> - offset += i * sizeof(u32);
> -
> trace_host1x_cdma_push_gather(dev_name(dev), bo,
> - num_words, offset,
> + num_words,
> + offset + i * sizeof(u32),
> mem);
> }
>
Will this cause trace_host1x_cdma_push_gather() to read out of bounds from
the mapped original BO using the large combined offset?
include/trace/events/host1x.h:host1x_cdma_push_gather() {
...
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(cmdbuf), cmdbuf+offset,
words * sizeof(u32));
...
}
Could this leak kernel data to the trace buffer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609-b4-host1x-small-fixes-a-v1-0-7c1131c0b3ad@nvidia.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 8:09 [PATCH 0/6] Miscellaneous fixes for the Host1x driver Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] gpu: host1x: Wait for timeout worker completion on channel free Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] gpu: host1x: Avoid double device_add when clients already present Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] gpu: host1x: Fix offset calculation in trace_write_gather Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] gpu: host1x: Avoid stack over-read in debug output helpers Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] gpu: host1x: Change pin_job() return type to int Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] gpu: host1x: Annotate intentional syncpoint wrap-around Mikko Perttunen
2026-06-09 8:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:52 ` [PATCH 0/6] Miscellaneous fixes for the Host1x driver Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609082605.916DF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox