From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] ttm: hook up memcg placement flags.
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 03:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706030135.17F6D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706024122.853329-7-airlied@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Direct dereference of `bo->resource` without a NULL check in `ttm_bo_setup_export` causes a kernel panic when exporting pipeline-gutted BOs.
--
commit dc7f000aeb70e2be50c58ca89d0162684ebb0574
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
ttm: hook up memcg placement flags.
This commit adds a placement flag to request memory cgroup accounting for
system memory allocations. It updates various callers of ttm_bo_populate()
to pass this flag by checking the placement flags of the buffer object's
resource.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 8e38c6c5c82ef..54ee9d4e7a139 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ int ttm_bo_setup_export(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> if (ret != 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = ttm_bo_populate(bo, false, ctx);
> + ret = ttm_bo_populate(bo, bo->resource->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_MEMCG, ctx);
[Severity: Critical]
Can this dereference a NULL pointer if the buffer object has been
pipeline-gutted?
Under memory pressure, TTM eviction logic may pipeline-gut the BO via
ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(), which frees the resource and sets bo->resource
to NULL.
If userspace then invokes the DMA-BUF export ioctl on this gutted BO, the
driver's export callback (like amdgpu_gem_prime_export) can call
ttm_bo_setup_export() without re-validating the BO. This results in an
unconditional dereference of the NULL pointer when evaluating
bo->resource->placement.
Would it be safer to check if bo->resource is valid before checking its
placement flags?
> ttm_bo_unreserve(bo);
> return ret;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706024122.853329-1-airlied@gmail.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 2:36 drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] memcg: add support for GPU page counters. (v4) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 3:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] ttm: add a memcg accounting flag to the alloc/populate APIs Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 03/10] ttm/pool: initialise the shrinker earlier Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] ttm: add objcg pointer to bo and tt (v2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] ttm/pool: enable memcg tracking and shrinker. (v3) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] ttm: hook up memcg placement flags Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 3:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] memcontrol: allow objcg api when memcg is config off Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 2:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] amdgpu: add support for memory cgroups Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 3:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 09/10] ttm: add support for a module option to disable memcg integration Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 3:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] xe: create a flag to enable memcg accounting for XE as well Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 7:59 ` drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) Christian König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-06 5:22 drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) (v2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 5:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] ttm: hook up memcg placement flags Dave Airlie
2026-07-06 5:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706030135.17F6D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox