dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xe: create a flag to enable memcg accounting for XE as well.
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 03:18:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706031832.2CF491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706024122.853329-11-airlied@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing memcg accounting for userspace dumb buffers created via xe_bo_dumb_create.
- [High] Page tables created asynchronously via workqueues are charged to the kworker's root memcg instead of the user's memcg.
- [High] BOs created with deferred backing bypass memcg accounting upon CPU page fault.
--

commit ebf9090c8281d875d2f980bb34d324c88a8b277f
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>

xe: create a flag to enable memcg accounting for XE as well.

This adds support for memcg accounting to ttm object used by xe driver.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const struct ttm_place sys_placement_flags = {
>  	.flags = 0,
>  };
>  
> +/* TTM_PL_FLAG_MEMCG is not set, those placements are used for eviction */
>  static struct ttm_placement sys_placement = {

[Severity: High]
If userspace creates a buffer object with the deferred backing flag, mmaps
it, and accesses it via the CPU before the GPU validates it,
xe_bo_init_locked() assigns sys_placement as the initial placement. 
Since sys_placement lacks TTM_PL_FLAG_MEMCG, will a CPU page fault
(which calls xe_bo_fault_migrate() and ttm_bo_populate()) allocate memory
without charging the memcg? Does this allow userspace to bypass memcg
limits for deferred backing buffers?

>  	.num_placement = 1,
>  	.placement = &sys_placement_flags,
>  };

[ ... ]

> @@ -2384,6 +2385,9 @@ struct xe_bo *xe_bo_init_locked(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
>  	placement = (type == ttm_bo_type_sg ||
>  		     bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_DEFER_BACKING) ? &sys_placement :
>  		&bo->placement;
> +
> +	if (bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_ACCOUNTED)
> +		ttm_bo_set_cgroup(&bo->ttm, get_obj_cgroup_from_current());

[Severity: High]
When page tables are created asynchronously, such as from GPU page fault
handlers or rebinding operations executing in workqueues via
xe_pt_create(), get_obj_cgroup_from_current() will resolve to the
kworker's context. Does this cause these allocations to be incorrectly
charged to the root memcg instead of the user's memcg?

>  	err = ttm_bo_init_reserved(&xe->ttm, &bo->ttm, type,
>  				   placement, alignment,

[ ... ]

> @@ -3361,7 +3365,7 @@ int xe_gem_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->size & ~PAGE_MASK))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	bo_flags = 0;
> +	bo_flags = XE_BO_FLAG_ACCOUNTED;
>  	if (args->flags & DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_DEFER_BACKING)
>  		bo_flags |= XE_BO_FLAG_DEFER_BACKING;

[Severity: High]
This correctly adds the accounting flag for standard GEM object creation, but
are dumb buffers created via xe_bo_dumb_create() missing this flag?

Dumb buffers are also allocated on behalf of userspace via
DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATE_DUMB:

xe_bo_dumb_create() {
    ...
    bo = xe_bo_create_user(xe, NULL, args->size,
                           DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC,
                           XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(xe_device_get_root_tile(xe)) |
                           XE_BO_FLAG_FORCE_WC |
                           XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS, NULL);
}

Do these also need XE_BO_FLAG_ACCOUNTED to prevent a malicious or buggy
userspace application from bypassing memcg limits to exhaust host memory?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706024122.853329-1-airlied@gmail.com?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  2:36 drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] memcg: add support for GPU page counters. (v4) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  3:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] ttm: add a memcg accounting flag to the alloc/populate APIs Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 03/10] ttm/pool: initialise the shrinker earlier Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] ttm: add objcg pointer to bo and tt (v2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] ttm/pool: enable memcg tracking and shrinker. (v3) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] ttm: hook up memcg placement flags Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  3:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] memcontrol: allow objcg api when memcg is config off Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  2:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] amdgpu: add support for memory cgroups Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  3:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 09/10] ttm: add support for a module option to disable memcg integration Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  3:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  2:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] xe: create a flag to enable memcg accounting for XE as well Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  3:18   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06  7:59 ` drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) Christian König
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-06  5:22 drm/ttm/memcg/lru: enable memcg tracking for ttm, xe and amdgpu driver (part 2) (v2) Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  5:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] xe: create a flag to enable memcg accounting for XE as well Dave Airlie
2026-07-06  5:50   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706031832.2CF491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox