From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alex Hung" <alex.hung@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 03:45:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711034523.B8F551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711033159.3096477-1-alex.hung@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Lockless state machine corruption on overlapping writeback jobs stalls fences and leaks vblank references.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional memory leak of dc_writeback_info structure in dm_set_writeback.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing ---
commit d7178e82119f1d066c5082ca676728119bef3a13
Author: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing
Hold a vblank reference while writeback is pending and signal the out
fence on the second vblank instead of using mdelay(). Add
amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback() to finish and clean up writeback
from both the IRQ and teardown paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index b97ceabe61736..90ee250e6e360 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4988,6 +4989,7 @@ static void dm_set_writeback(struct amdgpu_display_manager *dm,
> * cannot run its matching vblank_put before this get.
> */
> WARN_ON(drm_crtc_vblank_get(&acrtc->base));
> + acrtc->wb_frame_done = false;
> acrtc->wb_pending = true;
[Severity: High]
Does this lockless state update cause issues if userspace submits another
writeback job immediately?
Since page flip events can signal on the first vblank, userspace could
submit a new atomic commit before the second vblank occurs. If a new
job is submitted in this window, dm_set_writeback() will overwrite
acrtc->wb_frame_done = false and acrtc->wb_pending = true without
holding a lock to protect the active job's state.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function leak the memory
allocated for wb_info?
Earlier in dm_set_writeback(), wb_info is allocated:
wb_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*wb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
Then it is passed to dc_stream_add_writeback():
dc_stream_add_writeback(dm->dc, crtc_state->stream, wb_info);
Since dc_stream_add_writeback() copies the structure by value into the
stream's array and does not take ownership of the pointer, it seems the
originally allocated wb_info pointer is never freed before returning.
Could this lead to continuous kernel memory leakage when userspace streams
writeback?
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> index c5467f34c51f1..4de7fb264cb26 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> @@ -1974,23 +1974,26 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
> return;
>
> if (acrtc->wb_conn && acrtc->wb_pending) {
> - struct dc_stream_state *stream = acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream;
> - unsigned int v_total, refresh_hz;
> -
> - v_total = stream->adjust.v_total_max ?
> - stream->adjust.v_total_max : stream->timing.v_total;
> - refresh_hz = div_u64((uint64_t) stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz *
> - 100LL, (v_total * stream->timing.h_total));
> - mdelay(1000 / refresh_hz);
> -
> - /*
> - * Completion (signalling the out fence and releasing the vblank
> - * reference taken in dm_set_writeback()) is handled by the shared
> - * helper, which is also used by the teardown path.
> - */
> - if (amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc))
> + if (acrtc->wb_frame_done) {
[Severity: High]
If the state was overwritten by a new commit as mentioned above, will this
read wb_frame_done == false on the second vblank?
If so, it seems it would take the else branch, set wb_frame_done = true
again, and completely skip calling amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback()
for the original job, potentially stalling the out-fence permanently and
leaking a vblank reference.
> + /*
> + * Second vblank: the DMA for the captured frame has
> + * had a full frame period to flush to memory. Signal
> + * the out fence now.
> + */
> + amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * First vblank after arming: the frame has been
> + * scanned out and the DMA is finishing. Disable
> + * writeback immediately to prevent the hardware from
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260711033159.3096477-1-alex.hung@amd.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 3:31 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing Alex Hung
2026-07-11 3:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260711034523.B8F551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox