* [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing
@ 2026-07-11 3:31 Alex Hung
2026-07-11 3:45 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2026-07-11 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, airlied, simona,
harry.wentland, sunpeng.li, siqueira, mwen, tzimmermann, ray.wu,
jpeisach, mario.limonciello, cristian.ciocaltea, alex.hung,
timur.kristof, ivan.lipski, chen-yu.chen, srinivasan.shanmugam,
amd-gfx, dri-devel
[WHY]
The out fence was signalled on the first vblank after arming, before the
DMA finished copying, and the old code worked around this with an
mdelay() in the IRQ handler.
[HOW]
Hold a vblank reference while writeback is pending and signal the out
fence on the second vblank instead of using mdelay(). Add
amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback() to finish and clean up writeback
from both the IRQ and teardown paths.
This can be verified by running IGT's kms_writeback 20 times without
timeout errors.
Assisted-by: Copilot:Claude-Opus-4.8
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h | 1 +
.../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 2 ++
.../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c | 33 ++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h
index 8069fc41cc7f..7c784277396a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h
@@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ struct amdgpu_crtc {
struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event;
bool wb_pending;
+ bool wb_frame_done;
bool wb_enabled;
struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_conn;
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index d67dcaa3fa8f..0f5453649200 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -4521,6 +4521,7 @@ bool amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(struct amdgpu_crtc *acrtc)
spin_lock_irqsave(&acrtc->wb_conn->job_lock, flags);
pending = acrtc->wb_pending;
acrtc->wb_pending = false;
+ acrtc->wb_frame_done = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acrtc->wb_conn->job_lock, flags);
if (!pending)
@@ -4988,6 +4989,7 @@ static void dm_set_writeback(struct amdgpu_display_manager *dm,
* cannot run its matching vblank_put before this get.
*/
WARN_ON(drm_crtc_vblank_get(&acrtc->base));
+ acrtc->wb_frame_done = false;
acrtc->wb_pending = true;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
index c5467f34c51f..4de7fb264cb2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
@@ -1974,23 +1974,26 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
return;
if (acrtc->wb_conn && acrtc->wb_pending) {
- struct dc_stream_state *stream = acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream;
- unsigned int v_total, refresh_hz;
-
- v_total = stream->adjust.v_total_max ?
- stream->adjust.v_total_max : stream->timing.v_total;
- refresh_hz = div_u64((uint64_t) stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz *
- 100LL, (v_total * stream->timing.h_total));
- mdelay(1000 / refresh_hz);
-
- /*
- * Completion (signalling the out fence and releasing the vblank
- * reference taken in dm_set_writeback()) is handled by the shared
- * helper, which is also used by the teardown path.
- */
- if (amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc))
+ if (acrtc->wb_frame_done) {
+ /*
+ * Second vblank: the DMA for the captured frame has
+ * had a full frame period to flush to memory. Signal
+ * the out fence now.
+ */
+ amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * First vblank after arming: the frame has been
+ * scanned out and the DMA is finishing. Disable
+ * writeback immediately to prevent the hardware from
+ * starting a new capture that would overwrite the
+ * buffer. Signal completion on the next vblank to
+ * ensure the DMA is fully flushed to memory.
+ */
dc_stream_fc_disable_writeback(adev->dm.dc,
acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream, 0);
+ acrtc->wb_frame_done = true;
+ }
}
vrr_active = amdgpu_dm_crtc_vrr_active_irq(acrtc);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing
2026-07-11 3:31 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing Alex Hung
@ 2026-07-11 3:45 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-11 3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Hung; +Cc: dri-devel
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Lockless state machine corruption on overlapping writeback jobs stalls fences and leaks vblank references.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional memory leak of dc_writeback_info structure in dm_set_writeback.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing ---
commit d7178e82119f1d066c5082ca676728119bef3a13
Author: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing
Hold a vblank reference while writeback is pending and signal the out
fence on the second vblank instead of using mdelay(). Add
amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback() to finish and clean up writeback
from both the IRQ and teardown paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index b97ceabe61736..90ee250e6e360 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4988,6 +4989,7 @@ static void dm_set_writeback(struct amdgpu_display_manager *dm,
> * cannot run its matching vblank_put before this get.
> */
> WARN_ON(drm_crtc_vblank_get(&acrtc->base));
> + acrtc->wb_frame_done = false;
> acrtc->wb_pending = true;
[Severity: High]
Does this lockless state update cause issues if userspace submits another
writeback job immediately?
Since page flip events can signal on the first vblank, userspace could
submit a new atomic commit before the second vblank occurs. If a new
job is submitted in this window, dm_set_writeback() will overwrite
acrtc->wb_frame_done = false and acrtc->wb_pending = true without
holding a lock to protect the active job's state.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function leak the memory
allocated for wb_info?
Earlier in dm_set_writeback(), wb_info is allocated:
wb_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*wb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
Then it is passed to dc_stream_add_writeback():
dc_stream_add_writeback(dm->dc, crtc_state->stream, wb_info);
Since dc_stream_add_writeback() copies the structure by value into the
stream's array and does not take ownership of the pointer, it seems the
originally allocated wb_info pointer is never freed before returning.
Could this lead to continuous kernel memory leakage when userspace streams
writeback?
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> index c5467f34c51f1..4de7fb264cb26 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
> @@ -1974,23 +1974,26 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
> return;
>
> if (acrtc->wb_conn && acrtc->wb_pending) {
> - struct dc_stream_state *stream = acrtc->dm_irq_params.stream;
> - unsigned int v_total, refresh_hz;
> -
> - v_total = stream->adjust.v_total_max ?
> - stream->adjust.v_total_max : stream->timing.v_total;
> - refresh_hz = div_u64((uint64_t) stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz *
> - 100LL, (v_total * stream->timing.h_total));
> - mdelay(1000 / refresh_hz);
> -
> - /*
> - * Completion (signalling the out fence and releasing the vblank
> - * reference taken in dm_set_writeback()) is handled by the shared
> - * helper, which is also used by the teardown path.
> - */
> - if (amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc))
> + if (acrtc->wb_frame_done) {
[Severity: High]
If the state was overwritten by a new commit as mentioned above, will this
read wb_frame_done == false on the second vblank?
If so, it seems it would take the else branch, set wb_frame_done = true
again, and completely skip calling amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback()
for the original job, potentially stalling the out-fence permanently and
leaking a vblank reference.
> + /*
> + * Second vblank: the DMA for the captured frame has
> + * had a full frame period to flush to memory. Signal
> + * the out fence now.
> + */
> + amdgpu_dm_crtc_complete_writeback(acrtc);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * First vblank after arming: the frame has been
> + * scanned out and the DMA is finishing. Disable
> + * writeback immediately to prevent the hardware from
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260711033159.3096477-1-alex.hung@amd.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-11 3:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-11 3:31 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix writeback completion timing Alex Hung
2026-07-11 3:45 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox