From: Zhenhao Wan <whi4ed0g@gmail.com>
To: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Liviu Dudau" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Zhenhao Wan <whi4ed0g@gmail.com>,
Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length range in drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:28:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902-drm-gpuvm-zerorange-v2-v2-2-da63269c6ec4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-drm-gpuvm-zerorange-v2-v2-0-da63269c6ec4@gmail.com>
drm_gpuvm_range_valid() is the common gate every GPUVM map/unmap path
funnels through: drm_gpuva_insert(), __drm_gpuvm_sm_map() and
__drm_gpuvm_sm_unmap() all reject a request unless it passes. It checks
for overflow, the managed-range bounds and kernel-node overlap, but it
never rejects a zero-length range. A range of 0 is page-aligned and
addr + 0 does not overflow, so a zero-length VM_BIND request from
userspace passes validation.
The GPUVA interval tree derives a node's last key as addr + range - 1
(GPUVA_LAST()). With range == 0 this underflows to addr - 1, producing
an interval whose end lies below its start (and, for addr == 0, wraps to
U64_MAX). __drm_gpuva_insert() then issues its overlap query with that
inverted interval, so the -EEXIST guard matches nothing and a malformed
zero-length node is inserted, corrupting the augmented interval tree's
subtree-last invariant and misleading the overlap checks of later
map/unmap operations on the same VM.
Because the shared helper's own kerneldoc promises to validate "the
range" yet silently accepts range == 0, drivers have papered over this
individually and inconsistently: imagination and xe reject a zero range
at/near the ioctl boundary, while nouveau and msm do not. Fix it once at
the common gate so every current and future caller is covered.
The only in-tree user that legitimately accepts a zero range,
xe's DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP_ALL, interprets it at its ioctl layer and
never passes range == 0 into the GPUVM core, so it is unaffected. The
in-core lookups drm_gpuva_find_prev()/drm_gpuva_find_next() pass
range == 1 and are likewise unaffected.
Fixes: e6303f323b1a ("drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings")
Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhenhao Wan <whi4ed0g@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
index c422c5af1f4b..b73ad6988171 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
@@ -1021,7 +1021,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range)
* @addr: the base address
* @range: the range starting from the base address
*
- * Checks whether the range is within the GPUVM's managed boundaries.
+ * Checks whether the range is non-zero and within the GPUVM's managed
+ * boundaries.
*
* Returns: true for a valid range, false otherwise
*/
@@ -1029,7 +1030,8 @@ bool
drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
u64 addr, u64 range)
{
- return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
+ return range != 0 &&
+ !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
drm_gpuvm_in_mm_range(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
!drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(gpuvm, addr, range);
}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length VM_BIND ranges at the shared gate Zhenhao Wan
2026-09-02 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/panthor: Treat a zero-length VM_BIND op as a no-op Zhenhao Wan
2026-09-02 12:28 ` Zhenhao Wan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902-drm-gpuvm-zerorange-v2-v2-2-da63269c6ec4@gmail.com \
--to=whi4ed0g@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox