* [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/panthor: Treat a zero-length VM_BIND op as a no-op
2026-09-02 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length VM_BIND ranges at the shared gate Zhenhao Wan
@ 2026-09-02 12:28 ` Zhenhao Wan
2026-09-02 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length range in drm_gpuvm_range_valid() Zhenhao Wan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhenhao Wan @ 2026-09-02 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Brezillon, Steven Price, Liviu Dudau, Maarten Lankhorst,
Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
Grant Likely, Heiko Stuebner, Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost,
Thomas Hellström, Alice Ryhl
Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, Lyude Paul, nouveau, Dave Airlie,
Zhenhao Wan, Yuhao Jiang, stable
panthor_vm_bind_exec_sync_op() short-circuits a zero-length operation: it
returns 0 immediately when op->size is 0. The asynchronous VM_BIND path
has no equivalent guard.
An async MAP or UNMAP with size == 0 is not rejected: only alignment is
checked in panthor_vm_bind_prepare_op_ctx() and IS_ALIGNED(0) is true, so
the op is queued and panthor_vm_exec_op() calls drm_gpuvm_sm_map() /
drm_gpuvm_sm_unmap() with a zero range. A zero-length map into unmapped
space then reaches drm_gpuva_insert(), where the GPUVA interval-tree last
key addr + range - 1 underflows to addr - 1 and a malformed node whose end
lies below its start can be inserted, corrupting the augmented interval
tree.
Mirror the synchronous path and treat a zero-length map or unmap as a no-op
in panthor_vm_exec_op(), before any lock is taken or the GPUVA tree is
touched. This also keeps the async path robust if the core drm_gpuvm range
validation is tightened to reject a zero range, which would otherwise make
panthor_vm_bind_run_job() flag the VM unusable on the resulting -EINVAL.
Fixes: 647810ec2476 ("drm/panthor: Add the MMU/VM logical block")
Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhenhao Wan <whi4ed0g@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
index e592a8ebb478..93542f59cb5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
@@ -2591,6 +2591,15 @@ panthor_vm_exec_op(struct panthor_vm *vm, struct panthor_vm_op_ctx *op,
if (op_type == DRM_PANTHOR_VM_BIND_OP_TYPE_SYNC_ONLY)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * A zero-length map or unmap is a no-op. The synchronous bind path
+ * already short-circuits it in panthor_vm_bind_exec_sync_op(); mirror
+ * that here so an asynchronous zero-length op does not fail and flag the
+ * VM as unusable.
+ */
+ if (!op->va.range)
+ return 0;
+
mutex_lock(&vm->op_lock);
vm->op_ctx = op;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length range in drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
2026-09-02 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/gpuvm: reject zero-length VM_BIND ranges at the shared gate Zhenhao Wan
2026-09-02 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/panthor: Treat a zero-length VM_BIND op as a no-op Zhenhao Wan
@ 2026-09-02 12:28 ` Zhenhao Wan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhenhao Wan @ 2026-09-02 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Brezillon, Steven Price, Liviu Dudau, Maarten Lankhorst,
Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
Grant Likely, Heiko Stuebner, Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost,
Thomas Hellström, Alice Ryhl
Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, Lyude Paul, nouveau, Dave Airlie,
Zhenhao Wan, Yuhao Jiang, stable
drm_gpuvm_range_valid() is the common gate every GPUVM map/unmap path
funnels through: drm_gpuva_insert(), __drm_gpuvm_sm_map() and
__drm_gpuvm_sm_unmap() all reject a request unless it passes. It checks
for overflow, the managed-range bounds and kernel-node overlap, but it
never rejects a zero-length range. A range of 0 is page-aligned and
addr + 0 does not overflow, so a zero-length VM_BIND request from
userspace passes validation.
The GPUVA interval tree derives a node's last key as addr + range - 1
(GPUVA_LAST()). With range == 0 this underflows to addr - 1, producing
an interval whose end lies below its start (and, for addr == 0, wraps to
U64_MAX). __drm_gpuva_insert() then issues its overlap query with that
inverted interval, so the -EEXIST guard matches nothing and a malformed
zero-length node is inserted, corrupting the augmented interval tree's
subtree-last invariant and misleading the overlap checks of later
map/unmap operations on the same VM.
Because the shared helper's own kerneldoc promises to validate "the
range" yet silently accepts range == 0, drivers have papered over this
individually and inconsistently: imagination and xe reject a zero range
at/near the ioctl boundary, while nouveau and msm do not. Fix it once at
the common gate so every current and future caller is covered.
The only in-tree user that legitimately accepts a zero range,
xe's DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP_ALL, interprets it at its ioctl layer and
never passes range == 0 into the GPUVM core, so it is unaffected. The
in-core lookups drm_gpuva_find_prev()/drm_gpuva_find_next() pass
range == 1 and are likewise unaffected.
Fixes: e6303f323b1a ("drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings")
Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhenhao Wan <whi4ed0g@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
index c422c5af1f4b..b73ad6988171 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
@@ -1021,7 +1021,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range)
* @addr: the base address
* @range: the range starting from the base address
*
- * Checks whether the range is within the GPUVM's managed boundaries.
+ * Checks whether the range is non-zero and within the GPUVM's managed
+ * boundaries.
*
* Returns: true for a valid range, false otherwise
*/
@@ -1029,7 +1030,8 @@ bool
drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
u64 addr, u64 range)
{
- return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
+ return range != 0 &&
+ !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
drm_gpuvm_in_mm_range(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
!drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(gpuvm, addr, range);
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread