* [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: check pm_runtime_resume_and_get() during resume
@ 2026-09-04 12:55 Roman Demidov
2026-09-04 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roman Demidov @ 2026-09-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: Roman Demidov, Sean Paul, Konrad Dybcio, Akhil P Oommen,
Dmitry Baryshkov, Abhinav Kumar, Jessica Zhang, Marijn Suijten,
David Airlie, Simona Vetter, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel, freedreno,
linux-kernel, lvc-project
The return values of pm_runtime_resume_and_get() calls in a6xx_pm_resume()
are not checked, which can lead to hardware access on suspended devices
and PM reference underflows.
Fix this by checking the return value of each pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
call and properly unwinding the previously acquired resources on failure.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 5a903a44a984 ("drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support")
Signed-off-by: Roman Demidov <roman.demidov.nn@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index f9de9329dee3..0cf205ea744b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -2175,44 +2175,48 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
- goto err_set_opp;
+ goto err_unlock;
}
dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
/* Set the core clock and bus bw, having VDD scaling in mind */
dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, opp);
- pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
- pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_opp_clear;
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_put_dev;
ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
if (ret)
- goto err_bulk_clk;
+ goto err_put_gxpd;
ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gmu->nr_clocks, gmu->clocks);
if (ret) {
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
- goto err_bulk_clk;
+ goto err_put_gxpd;
}
if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
- /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
- if (ret) {
-err_bulk_clk:
- pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
- pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
- dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
- }
-err_set_opp:
mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
+ msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
+ a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
- if (!ret) {
- msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
- a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
- }
+ return 0;
+ /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
+err_put_gxpd:
+ pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
+err_put_dev:
+ pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
+err_opp_clear:
+ dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
+err_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: check pm_runtime_resume_and_get() during resume
2026-09-04 12:55 [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: check pm_runtime_resume_and_get() during resume Roman Demidov
@ 2026-09-04 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-04 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Demidov; +Cc: dri-devel
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional `pm_runtime_resume_and_get()` on `gmu->gxpd` causes a NULL pointer dereference if the gxpd power domain is absent.
- [High] The `opp` pointer is used after its reference count has been dropped, creating a Use-After-Free vulnerability.
--
commit 8f5f79a7915a90cb43eb05a5eb535e070ae669bd
Author: Roman Demidov <roman.demidov.nn@gmail.com>
drm/msm/a6xx: check pm_runtime_resume_and_get() during resume
This commit adds return value checks to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() calls
during a6xx GPU resume to prevent hardware access on suspended devices. It
also unwinds acquired resources properly if these calls fail.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index f9de9329dee39..0cf205ea744be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -2175,44 +2175,48 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
> if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
> - goto err_set_opp;
> + goto err_unlock;
> }
> dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>
> /* Set the core clock and bus bw, having VDD scaling in mind */
> dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, opp);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code cause a use-after-free of
the opp pointer?
The dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil() function returns an OPP object with an
incremented reference count. Dropping this reference via dev_pm_opp_put()
could cause the object to be freed if it is concurrently removed from the
OPP table. Can dev_pm_opp_set_opp() then dereference the freed memory?
>
> - pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
> - pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_opp_clear;
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can this cause a NULL pointer
dereference if the gxpd power domain is absent?
If the driver initializes a GMU wrapper device on a platform where the
device tree does not provide a 'gx' power domain, gmu->gxpd remains NULL.
Calling pm_runtime_resume_and_get(NULL) will immediately dereference the
pointer inside __pm_runtime_resume().
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_put_dev;
[ ... ]
> - /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
> - if (ret) {
> -err_bulk_clk:
> - pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
> - pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
> - dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
> - }
> -err_set_opp:
> mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> + msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
> + a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
>
> - if (!ret) {
> - msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
> - a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
> - }
> + return 0;
>
> + /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
> +err_put_gxpd:
> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
[Severity: High]
Can this error path also crash by unconditionally dereferencing a NULL gxpd
pointer?
While the initial pm_runtime_resume_and_get() issue is pre-existing, this
patch introduces an additional crash point here. If gmu->gxpd is NULL, this
newly added pm_runtime_put() will trigger a kernel panic.
> +err_put_dev:
> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
> +err_opp_clear:
> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
> +err_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> return ret;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904125523.43813-1-roman.demidov.nn@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-05 15:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-04 12:55 [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: check pm_runtime_resume_and_get() during resume Roman Demidov
2026-09-04 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox