From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chad Versace <chadversary@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: Why does OUT_FENCE_PTR point not to an fd (s32) but to an s64?
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:58:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3771380.gEfP3ddfRA@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109102322.uuatwip5v6bjo6te@phenom.ffwll.local>
Hi Daniel,
On Monday 09 Jan 2017 11:23:23 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:04:55PM -0800, Chad Versace wrote:
> > Was this a mistake in the API? If so, can we fix this ABI mistake before
> > kernel consumers rely on this?
> >
> > I naïvely expected that OUT_FENCE_PTR would be a pointer to, obviously, a
> > fence fd (s32 __user *). But it's not. It's s64 __user *. Due to that
> > surprise, I spent several hours chasing down weird corruption in Rob
> > Clark's kmscube. The kernel unexpectedly cleared the 32 bits *above* an
> > `int kms_fence_fd` in userspace.
>
> Never use unsized types for uabi. I guess we could have used s32, but then
> someone is going to store this in a long and it goes boom on 64 bit,
Why so ? And why do we care ? The commonly accepted practice is to store file
descriptors in int variables. s32 is an int on all platforms, so that's fine
too. If we use a s32 pointer here, and someone decides to store it in a long,
bool or cast it to a complex, that's their problem :-)
> while it works on 32 bit. "int" doesn't have that problem directly, but it's
> still a red flag imo.
>
> > For reference, here's the relevant DRM code.
> >
> > // file: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > struct drm_out_fence_state {
> > s64 __user *out_fence_ptr;
> > struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > int fd;
> > };
> >
> > static int setup_out_fence(struct drm_out_fence_state *fence_state,
> > struct dma_fence *fence)
> > {
> > fence_state->fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > if (fence_state->fd < 0)
> > return fence_state->fd;
> >
> > if (put_user(fence_state->fd, fence_state->out_fence_ptr))
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > fence_state->sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > if (!fence_state->sync_file)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-06 21:04 Why does OUT_FENCE_PTR point not to an fd (s32) but to an s64? Chad Versace
2017-01-06 21:13 ` Chad Versace
2017-01-09 10:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-10 20:58 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-01-12 19:17 ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-01-12 19:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-12 19:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-12 19:34 ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-01-13 21:31 ` Chad Versace
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3771380.gEfP3ddfRA@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=chadversary@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox